Institute of Training Science and Sport Informatics, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany.
J Sports Sci. 2010 Apr;28(6):609-14. doi: 10.1080/02640410903582768.
Three textiles with increasing compressive surface were compared with non-compressive conventional clothing on physiological and perceptual variables during sub-maximal and maximal running. Fifteen well-trained endurance athletes (mean+/-s: age 27.1+/-4.8 years, VO(2max) 63.7+/-4.9 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) performed four sub-maximal (approximately 70% VO(2max)) and maximal tests with and without different compression stockings, tights, and whole-body compression suits. Arterial lactate concentration, oxygen saturation and partial pressure, pH, oxygen uptake, and ratings of muscle soreness were recorded before, during, and after all tests. In addition, we assessed time to exhaustion. Sub-maximal (P=0.22) and maximal oxygen uptake (P=0.26), arterial lactate concentration (P=0.16; 0.20), pH (P=0.23; 0.46), oxygen saturation (P=0.13; 0.26), and oxygen partial pressure (P=0.09; 0.20) did not differ between the types of clothing (effect sizes=0.00-0.45). Ratings of perceived exertion (P=0.10; 0.15), muscle soreness (P=0.09; 0.10) and time to exhaustion (P=0.16) were also unaffected by the different clothing (effect sizes=0.28-0.85). This was the first study to evaluate the effect on endurance performance of different types of compression clothing with increasing amounts of compressive surface. Overall, there were no performance benefits when using the compression garments.
三种具有不同压缩表面的纺织品与非压缩常规服装在亚最大和最大跑步时的生理和感知变量方面进行了比较。15 名训练有素的耐力运动员(平均+/-s:年龄 27.1+/-4.8 岁,最大摄氧量 63.7+/-4.9 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1))进行了四项亚最大(约 70%最大摄氧量)和最大测试,穿着不同的压缩长袜、紧身裤和全身压缩服。在所有测试前后记录动脉血乳酸浓度、氧饱和度和分压、pH 值、摄氧量和肌肉酸痛评分。此外,我们评估了疲劳时间。亚最大(P=0.22)和最大摄氧量(P=0.26)、动脉血乳酸浓度(P=0.16;0.20)、pH 值(P=0.23;0.46)、氧饱和度(P=0.13;0.26)和氧分压(P=0.09;0.20)在不同类型的服装之间没有差异(效应大小=0.00-0.45)。感知用力程度(P=0.10;0.15)、肌肉酸痛(P=0.09;0.10)和疲劳时间(P=0.16)也不受不同服装的影响(效应大小=0.28-0.85)。这是第一项评估具有不同压缩表面的不同类型压缩服装对耐力表现影响的研究。总体而言,使用压缩服装没有带来性能优势。