Suppr超能文献

定量吸入器技术:社区药房随时间推移实施的两种教育干预措施的效果。

Metered-dose inhaler technique: the effect of two educational interventions delivered in community pharmacy over time.

作者信息

Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia Z, Sinha Harun, So Stephen, Reddel Helen K

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Dr.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2010 Apr;47(3):251-6. doi: 10.3109/02770900903580843.

Abstract

Instruction is critical in order to ensure correct technique with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) by patients. The aim of this study was to compare the effects over time of two educational interventions delivered in community pharmacy to pMDI users. In this randomized controlled parallel-group study, pMDI technique was assessed before and after written and verbal instruction, alone or with physical demonstration, at baseline and 4, 8, and 16 weeks. The study recruited 52 subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Initially only 1/52 (6%) subject had correct pMDI technique (= checklist score 8/8), with mean baseline score 5 (SD 1) for both groups. Written and verbal information improved pMDI technique at 16 weeks (7 +/- 1, p < .05). Addition of physical demonstration resulted in significant improvement at weeks 4, 8, and 16 (7 +/- 1, 7 +/- 1, 7 +/- 1 respectively; p < .05 for each). Subjects receiving written and verbal information alone were less likely to return for follow-up than those receiving physical demonstration (8 weeks: 6/25 versus 19/27; p < .001). By the 8-week visit, 80% subjects in the physical demonstration group had correct technique prior to education, compared with 10% of subjects receiving written and verbal information alone (p < .05). There was some decline in inhaler technique by 16 weeks. The results demonstrate that adding a physical demonstration is more effective in improving pMDI technique than written and verbal instructions alone.

摘要

为确保患者正确使用压力定量吸入器(pMDIs),指导至关重要。本研究的目的是比较在社区药房对pMDI使用者进行的两种教育干预措施随时间推移产生的效果。在这项随机对照平行组研究中,在基线、4周、8周和16周时,分别在书面和口头指导前后,单独或结合实物演示对pMDI技术进行评估。该研究招募了52名患有哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的受试者。最初,只有1/52(6%)的受试者具备正确的pMDI技术(=检查表评分8/8),两组的平均基线评分为5(标准差1)。书面和口头信息在16周时改善了pMDI技术(7±1,p<.05)。增加实物演示在第4周、第8周和第16周均带来了显著改善(分别为7±1、7±1、7±1;各p<.05)。仅接受书面和口头信息的受试者比接受实物演示的受试者返回接受随访的可能性更小(8周时:6/25对19/27;p<.001)。到第8周就诊时,实物演示组中80%的受试者在接受教育前具备正确技术,而仅接受书面和口头信息的受试者中这一比例为10%(p<.05)。到16周时,吸入技术出现了一些下降。结果表明,增加实物演示比单纯的书面和口头指导在改善pMDI技术方面更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验