Department of Chronic Disease Prevention, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 9;5(4):e10100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010100.
The prevalence of diabetes is increasing in all industrialized countries and its prevention has become a public health priority. However, the predictors of diabetes risk are insufficiently understood. We evaluated, whether 31 novel biomarkers could help to predict the risk of incident diabetes.
The biomarkers were evaluated primarily in the FINRISK97 cohort (n = 7,827; 417 cases of clinically incident diabetes during the follow-up). The findings were replicated in the Health 2000 cohort (n = 4,977; 179 cases of clinically incident diabetes during the follow-up). We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the relative risk of diabetes, after adjusting for the classic risk factors, separately for each biomarker. Next, we assessed the discriminatory ability of single biomarkers using receiver operating characteristic curves and C-statistics, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Finally, we derived a biomarker score in the FINRISK97 cohort and validated it in the Health 2000 cohort. A score consisting of adiponectin, apolipoprotein B, C-reactive protein and ferritin almost doubled the relative risk of diabetes in the validation cohort (HR per one standard deviation increase 1.88, p = 2.8 e-5). It also improved discrimination of the model (IDI = 0.0149, p<0.0001) and reclassification of diabetes risk (NRI = 11.8%, p = 0.006). Gender-specific analyses suggested that the best score differed between men and women. Among men, the best results were obtained with the score of four biomarkers: adiponectin, apolipoprotein B, ferritin and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, which gave an NRI of 25.4% (p<0.0001). Among women, the best score included adiponectin, apolipoprotein B, C-reactive protein and insulin. It gave an NRI of 13.6% (p = 0.041).
We identified novel biomarkers that were associated with the risk of clinically incident diabetes over and above the classic risk factors. This gives new insights into the pathogenesis of diabetes and may help with targeting prevention and treatment.
所有工业化国家的糖尿病患病率都在上升,其预防已成为公共卫生的重点。然而,糖尿病风险的预测指标还不够完善。我们评估了 31 种新型生物标志物是否有助于预测糖尿病的发病风险。
该生物标志物最初在 FINRISK97 队列(n=7827;随访期间有 417 例临床确诊糖尿病病例)中进行评估。研究结果在 Health 2000 队列(n=4977;随访期间有 179 例临床确诊糖尿病病例)中得到了复制。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型,分别针对每种生物标志物,在调整了经典危险因素后,计算糖尿病的相对风险。接下来,我们使用接收者操作特征曲线和 C 统计量、综合判别改善(IDI)和净重新分类改善(NRI)来评估单一生物标志物的判别能力。最后,我们在 FINRISK97 队列中得出了生物标志物评分,并在 Health 2000 队列中进行了验证。在验证队列中,由脂联素、载脂蛋白 B、C 反应蛋白和铁蛋白组成的评分几乎使糖尿病的相对风险增加了一倍(每增加一个标准差的 HR 为 1.88,p=2.8e-5)。它还改善了模型的判别能力(IDI=0.0149,p<0.0001)和糖尿病风险的重新分类(NRI=11.8%,p=0.006)。性别特异性分析表明,最佳评分在男性和女性之间存在差异。在男性中,使用四种生物标志物(脂联素、载脂蛋白 B、铁蛋白和白细胞介素 1 受体拮抗剂)的评分效果最佳,NRI 为 25.4%(p<0.0001)。在女性中,最佳评分包括脂联素、载脂蛋白 B、C 反应蛋白和胰岛素。NRI 为 13.6%(p=0.041)。
我们发现了与经典危险因素相比,与临床确诊糖尿病风险相关的新型生物标志物。这为糖尿病的发病机制提供了新的见解,并可能有助于有针对性地进行预防和治疗。