Sullivan David L, Chumbley Christopher
JEMS. 2010 Apr;35(4):48-53. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2510(10)70094-2.
As EMS responders, we're challenged with complex patient care situations, and we often make decisions using past experiences, protocols and medical consultation to guide us through treatment "mazes." Using our natural problem-solving process, we tend to see a problem and think about similar past experiences, which we believe will help us implement a workable solution to the problem.(1,2,3) As we strive toward patient care excellence, however, we need to also look for the best solution for our patient care needs. Research continues to reveal that EMS responders may benefit from increasing their practice of critical thinking, problem-solving and decision-making in initial and continuing education.(4-13) Studies are finding that increased practice and exposure to triage, airway management and medication administration decision-making will allow us to achieve an increased quality of patient care.(7,14-22) Research has also found many reasons for patient care deficiencies, but a common theme is that EMS students and providers may not be getting enough practice or exposure to thinking "outside of the box" in difficult, critical-thinking scenarios.(12,14,18,20,21,23-25) This lack of exposure is why EMS educators should continue to challenge students with skills practice and competency assessments. Even with minimal time and practice in the classroom and clinical settings, EMS educators and instructors should infuse the curriculum with complex scenarios and problems to stimulate students' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.(26-30) This can be accomplished by using patient simulation, team-based thinking scenarios, realistic scenarios with variable outcomes and student-group-facilitated presentations.(12) All of these combined will have a greater meaning to students as they navigate through the many requirements to achieve competence and real-life experience in the patient care setting.(31) In response to this need, EMS educational materials are placing more emphasis on critical thinking and encouraging educators to challenge students to think through complex patient care situations.(28,32,33) THOUGHT PROCESS & DECISION-MAKING MODELS: These critical thinking and problem solving skills can't be taught by using only local protocols as gospel in the classroom, nor should we be teaching by a "cookbook" methodology alone.(12) Problem solving and decision-making processes in the public safety professions have developed and evolved over many years, allowing researchers to explore the thought processes decision-makers use when confronted with real-life situations.(1,2,34,35).
作为急救医疗服务人员,我们面临着复杂的患者护理情况,并且常常依据过去的经验、规程和医疗咨询来指导我们应对治疗“迷宫”,从而做出决策。运用我们自然的解决问题流程,我们往往会看到一个问题,并思考过去类似的经历,我们认为这将有助于我们找到一个可行的解决方案。(1,2,3)然而,当我们努力追求卓越的患者护理时,我们还需要为满足患者护理需求寻找最佳解决方案。研究不断表明,急救医疗服务人员可能会从在初始教育和继续教育中增加批判性思维、解决问题和决策的实践中受益。(4 - 13)研究发现,增加分诊、气道管理和药物管理决策方面的实践和接触,将使我们能够提高患者护理质量。(7,14 - 22)研究还发现了许多导致患者护理不足的原因,但一个共同的主题是,急救医疗专业的学生和从业者可能在困难的批判性思维场景中没有得到足够的“跳出框框”思考的实践或接触。(12,14,18,20,21,23 - 25)这种接触不足就是为什么急救医疗教育工作者应该继续通过技能实践和能力评估来挑战学生。即使在课堂和临床环境中的时间和实践最少,急救医疗教育工作者和教员也应该在课程中融入复杂的场景和问题,以激发学生的批判性思维和解决问题的能力。(26 - 30)这可以通过使用患者模拟、基于团队的思维场景、具有可变结果的现实场景以及学生小组主导的展示来实现。(12)当学生在患者护理环境中为达到能力要求和积累实际经验而应对众多要求时,所有这些结合起来对他们将具有更大的意义。(31)为了满足这一需求,急救医疗教育材料越来越强调批判性思维,并鼓励教育工作者挑战学生思考复杂的患者护理情况。(28,32,33)思维过程与决策模型:这些批判性思维和解决问题的技能不能仅仅通过在课堂上把当地规程当作真理来传授,我们也不应该仅仅采用“照本宣科”的方法来教学。(12)公共安全行业中的解决问题和决策过程已经发展演变了许多年,这使得研究人员能够探索决策者在面对现实情况时所使用的思维过程。(1,2,34,35)