用于估计最优动态治疗方案的动态机制边际结构均值模型，第二部分：结果证明
Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part II: proofs of results.
作者信息
Orellana Liliana, Rotnitzky Andrea, Robins James M
机构信息
Instituto de Cálculo, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentine.
出版信息
Int J Biostat. 2010 Mar 3;6(2):Article 9. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1242.
Abstract
In this companion article to "Dynamic Regime Marginal Structural Mean Models for Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes, Part I: Main Content" [Orellana, Rotnitzky and Robins (2010), IJB, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, Art. 7] we present (i) proofs of the claims in that paper, (ii) a proposal for the computation of a confidence set for the optimal index when this lies in a finite set, and (iii) an example to aid the interpretation of the positivity assumption.
摘要
在这篇与《用于估计最优动态治疗方案的动态系统边际结构均值模型，第一部分：主要内容》[奥雷利亚纳、罗特尼茨基和罗宾斯（2010年），《国际生物统计学杂志》，第6卷，第2期，第7篇文章]配套的文章中，我们给出了（i）该论文中主张的证明，（ii）当最优指标位于有限集时计算其置信集的一个提议，以及（iii）一个有助于解释正性假设的示例。
相似文献
1
Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part II: proofs of results.
Int J Biostat. 2010 Mar 3;6(2):Article 9. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1242.
2
Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 8.
3
Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part II.
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 3. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1241. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
4
Comparison of dynamic treatment regimes via inverse probability weighting.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Mar;98(3):237-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_329.x.
5
Marginal Structural Models: unbiased estimation for longitudinal studies.
Int J Public Health. 2011 Feb;56(1):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0198-4. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
6
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models.
J Causal Inference. 2014 Jun 18;2(2):147-185. doi: 10.1515/jci-2013-0007.
7
Demystifying optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):447-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00686.x.
8
Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2010 Jun;19(3):317-43. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105013. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
9
Bayesian inference for optimal dynamic treatment regimes in practice.
Int J Biostat. 2023 May 17;19(2):309-331. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0073. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
10
Ascertaining properties of weighting in the estimation of optimal treatment regimes under monotone missingness.
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 10;39(25):3503-3520. doi: 10.1002/sim.8678. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
引用本文的文献
1
A Bayesian multivariate hierarchical model for developing a treatment benefit index using mixed types of outcomes.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02333-z.
2
Inverse probability weighting to estimate impacts of hypothetical occupational limits on radon exposure to reduce lung cancer.
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1295-1303. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae299.
3
Ranking tailoring variables for constructing individualized treatment rules: an application to schizophrenia.
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2022 Mar;71(2):309-330. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12533. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
4
A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) protocol for empirically developing an adaptive preventive intervention for college student drinking reduction.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106089. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106089. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
gfoRmula: An R Package for Estimating the Effects of Sustained Treatment Strategies via the Parametric g-formula.
Patterns (N Y). 2020 Jun 12;1(3). doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100008. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Diagnosing Covariate Balance Across Levels of Right-Censoring Before and After Application of Inverse-Probability-of-Censoring Weights.
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 31;188(12):2213-2221. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz136.
7
SMART: Study protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized controlled trial to optimize weight loss management.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Jul;82:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 23.
8
Estimating long-term treatment effects in observational data: A comparison of the performance of different methods under real-world uncertainty.
Stat Med. 2018 Jul 10;37(15):2367-2390. doi: 10.1002/sim.7664. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
9
Estimating Effects of Dynamic Treatment Strategies in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies with Time-varying Confounding: A Primer.
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):288-297. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0124-x. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
Tools for the Precision Medicine Era: How to Develop Highly Personalized Treatment Recommendations From Cohort and Registry Data Using Q-Learning.
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):160-172. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx027.
本文引用的文献
1
Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 8.
Zotero 插件