Suppr超能文献

精准医学时代的工具:如何使用Q学习从队列和登记数据中制定高度个性化的治疗建议。

Tools for the Precision Medicine Era: How to Develop Highly Personalized Treatment Recommendations From Cohort and Registry Data Using Q-Learning.

作者信息

Krakow Elizabeth F, Hemmer Michael, Wang Tao, Logan Brent, Arora Mukta, Spellman Stephen, Couriel Daniel, Alousi Amin, Pidala Joseph, Last Michael, Lachance Silvy, Moodie Erica E M

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul 15;186(2):160-172. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx027.

Abstract

Q-learning is a method of reinforcement learning that employs backwards stagewise estimation to identify sequences of actions that maximize some long-term reward. The method can be applied to sequential multiple-assignment randomized trials to develop personalized adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs)-longitudinal practice guidelines highly tailored to time-varying attributes of individual patients. Sometimes, the basis for choosing which ATSs to include in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (or randomized controlled trial) may be inadequate. Nonrandomized data sources may inform the initial design of ATSs, which could later be prospectively validated. In this paper, we illustrate challenges involved in using nonrandomized data for this purpose with a case study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry (1995-2007) aimed at 1) determining whether the sequence of therapeutic classes used in graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis and in refractory graft-versus-host disease is associated with improved survival and 2) identifying donor and patient factors with which to guide individualized immunosuppressant selections over time. We discuss how to communicate the potential benefit derived from following an ATS at the population and subgroup levels and how to evaluate its robustness to modeling assumptions. This worked example may serve as a model for developing ATSs from registries and cohorts in oncology and other fields requiring sequential treatment decisions.

摘要

Q学习是一种强化学习方法,它采用反向逐步估计来识别能使某些长期奖励最大化的行动序列。该方法可应用于序贯多重分配随机试验,以制定个性化自适应治疗策略(ATS)——高度针对个体患者随时间变化的特征量身定制的纵向实践指南。有时,在序贯多重分配随机试验(或随机对照试验)中选择纳入哪些ATS的依据可能并不充分。非随机数据源可为ATS的初始设计提供信息,随后可对其进行前瞻性验证。在本文中,我们通过国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心登记处(1995 - 2007年)的一个案例研究,阐述了为此目的使用非随机数据所涉及的挑战,该研究旨在:1)确定移植物抗宿主病预防和难治性移植物抗宿主病中使用的治疗类别序列是否与生存率提高相关;2)识别随着时间推移可用于指导个体化免疫抑制剂选择的供体和患者因素。我们讨论了如何在总体和亚组层面传达遵循ATS所带来的潜在益处,以及如何评估其对建模假设的稳健性。这个实例可作为一个模型,用于从肿瘤学及其他需要序贯治疗决策的领域的登记处和队列中开发ATS。

相似文献

6
LIBERTI: A SMART study in plastic surgery.利伯蒂:一项整形手术中的智能研究。
Clin Trials. 2018 Jun;15(3):286-293. doi: 10.1177/1740774518762435. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

7
Reinforcement Learning for Precision Oncology.用于精准肿瘤学的强化学习
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;13(18):4624. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184624.
9
Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Practical Introduction to a Paradigm Shift.皮肤病学中的人工智能:范式转变的实用入门
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020 Nov 8;11(6):881-889. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_388_20. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Bayesian inference and dynamic treatment regimes.预测性贝叶斯推理与动态治疗方案
Biom J. 2015 Nov;57(6):941-58. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400153. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
3
Causal Inference Under Multiple Versions of Treatment.多种治疗版本下的因果推断
J Causal Inference. 2013 May 1;1(1):1-20. doi: 10.1515/jci-2012-0002.
4
SMART designs in cancer research: Past, present, and future.癌症研究中的SMART设计:过去、现在与未来。
Clin Trials. 2014 Aug;11(4):445-456. doi: 10.1177/1740774514525691. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
7
Analysis of multi-stage treatments for recurrent diseases.分析复发性疾病的多阶段治疗方法。
Stat Med. 2012 Oct 30;31(24):2805-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.5456. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.定性交互作用的变量选择
Stat Methodol. 2011 Jan 30;1(8):42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.stamet.2009.05.003.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验