Suppr超能文献

当使用经过验证的腕式或臂式血压计在家中测量血压时,收缩压取决于手臂的位置。

Systolic blood pressure is depending on the arm position when home blood pressure is measured with a wrist or an arm validated monitor.

作者信息

Dourmap Caroline, Girerd Xavier, Marquand André, Fourcade Jacques, Hottelard Carine, Begasse François, Babici Daniela, Dimitrov Yves, Hanon Olivier

机构信息

Chu Rennes, Cardiology, RENNES, France.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2010 Aug;15(4):181-3. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328337b4a2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare home blood pressure (BP) values obtained with two validated OMRON (wrist or arm) monitors used in the same individual sequentially, but with two different hand positions.

METHODS

In 200 hypertensive individuals referred to hypertension specialists, a self-measurement of BP was performed sequentially with an OMRON M4-I (arm cuff, A/A, British Hypertention Society validation) and an OMRON RX-I (wrist cuff, B/B, BHS validation). Each patient recorded home BP during two periods of 4 days with three measures in the morning and three in the evening. Order for use of each monitor was randomized. For the first 100 patients, the hand was positioned on the opposite shoulder whereas for the next 100 patients, the hand was positioned on the opposite elbow. BP values were reported on a standardized document.

RESULTS

In this population, aged 60+/-10 years, with 54% of men, BP values were 136+/-/80+/- mmHg with the wrist monitor (WM) when the hand is positioned on the opposite shoulder as compared with 144+/-16/81+/-9 mmHg obtained with the arm monitor taken as the gold standard. On the contrary, BP values were 142+/-/82+/- mmHg with the WM when the hand is positioned on the opposite elbow as compared with 144+/-16/81+/-9 mmHg obtained with the arm monitor. The lower value of systolic blood pressure observed with WM positioned on the shoulder is independent of age, initial BP level and order of use (multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSION

When advising home BP monitoring with a WM, the instruction to be given to patients is to position the hand on the opposite elbow.

摘要

目的

比较使用两种经过验证的欧姆龙(腕式或臂式)血压计,在同一受试者身上依次采用两种不同手部姿势时所测得的家庭血压值。

方法

选取200名转诊至高血压专科医生处的高血压患者,依次使用欧姆龙M4-I(臂式袖带,A/A,经英国高血压学会验证)和欧姆龙RX-I(腕式袖带,B/B,经英国高血压学会验证)进行血压自我测量。每位患者在两个为期4天的时间段内记录家庭血压,每天早上测量3次,晚上测量3次。每种血压计的使用顺序是随机的。对于前100名患者,手部放在对侧肩部;对于后100名患者,手部放在对侧肘部。血压值记录在标准化表格上。

结果

在这个年龄为60±10岁、男性占54%的人群中,当手部放在对侧肩部时,腕式血压计(WM)测得的血压值为136±/80± mmHg,而以臂式血压计作为金标准测得的值为144±16/81±9 mmHg。相反,当手部放在对侧肘部时,WM测得的血压值为142±/82± mmHg,与臂式血压计测得的144±16/81±9 mmHg相比。将WM放在肩部时观察到的收缩压较低值与年龄、初始血压水平和使用顺序无关(多变量分析)。

结论

当建议使用WM进行家庭血压监测时,应告知患者将手部放在对侧肘部。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验