Memorial Hospital, Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Pawtucket, RI 02860, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul;25(7):746-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1347-4. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
Reflective capacity has been described as an essential characteristic of professionally competent clinical practice, core to ACGME competencies. Reflection has been recently linked to promoting effective use of feedback in medical education and associated with improved diagnostic accuracy, suggesting promising outcomes. There has been a proliferation of reflective writing pedagogy within medical education to foster development of reflective capacity, extend empathy with deepened understanding of patients' experience of illness, and promote practitioner well-being. At Alpert Med, "interactive" reflective writing with guided individualized feedback from interdisciplinary faculty to students' reflective writing has been implemented in a Doctoring course and Family Medicine clerkship as an educational method to achieve these aims. Such initiatives, however, raise fundamental questions of reflection definition, program design, efficacy of methods, and outcomes assessment. Within this article, we consider opportunities and challenges associated with implementation of reflective writing curricula for promotion of reflective capacity within medical education. We reflect upon reflection.
反思能力被描述为专业胜任临床实践的基本特征,也是 ACGME 能力的核心。反思最近与促进医学教育中有效使用反馈联系在一起,并与提高诊断准确性相关,这表明有很好的效果。在医学教育中,反思性写作教学法大量涌现,以促进反思能力的发展,加深对患者疾病体验的同理心,并促进从业者的幸福感。在 Alpert Med,“互动式”反思性写作与跨学科教师对学生反思性写作的个性化指导反馈相结合,已在一门医学课程和家庭医学实习中作为一种教育方法来实现这些目标。然而,这些举措引发了关于反思定义、课程设计、方法有效性和结果评估等基本问题。在本文中,我们考虑了在医学教育中实施反思性写作课程以促进反思能力发展的相关机会和挑战。我们对反思进行了反思。