• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟任务在注视控制中的作用。

Modelling the role of task in the control of gaze.

作者信息

Ballard Dana H, Hayhoe Mary M

机构信息

Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):1185-1204. doi: 10.1080/13506280902978477.

DOI:10.1080/13506280902978477
PMID:20411027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2856937/
Abstract

Gaze changes and the resultant fixations that orchestrate the sequential acquisition of information from the visual environment are the central feature of primate vision. How are we to understand their function? For the most part, theories of fixation targets have been image based: The hypothesis being that the eye is drawn to places in the scene that contain discontinuities in image features such as motion, colour, and texture. But are these features the cause of the fixations, or merely the result of fixations that have been planned to serve some visual function? This paper examines the issue and reviews evidence from various image-based and task-based sources. Our conclusion is that the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of fixation control being essentially task based.

摘要

注视变化以及由此产生的注视行为,它们协调着从视觉环境中按顺序获取信息,是灵长类动物视觉的核心特征。我们该如何理解它们的功能呢?在很大程度上,关于注视目标的理论一直是基于图像的:其假设是眼睛会被场景中包含图像特征(如运动、颜色和纹理)不连续的地方所吸引。但这些特征是注视行为的原因,还是仅仅是为了实现某种视觉功能而预先计划的注视行为的结果呢?本文探讨了这个问题,并回顾了来自各种基于图像和基于任务的证据来源。我们的结论是,证据压倒性地支持注视控制本质上是基于任务的。

相似文献

1
Modelling the role of task in the control of gaze.模拟任务在注视控制中的作用。
Vis cogn. 2009 Aug 1;17(6-7):1185-1204. doi: 10.1080/13506280902978477.
2
Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes.注意力同步以及观看任务对静态和动态场景中注视行为的影响。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 17;13(8):16. doi: 10.1167/13.8.16.
3
Quantifying task-related gaze.量化与任务相关的注视。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1318-1329. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02883-w. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
How does image noise affect actual and predicted human gaze allocation in assessing image quality?在评估图像质量时,图像噪声如何影响实际的和预测的人类注视分配?
Vision Res. 2015 Jul;112:11-25. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Gaze behavior during 3-D face identification is depth cue invariant.三维人脸识别过程中的注视行为不依赖深度线索。
J Vis. 2017 Feb 1;17(2):9. doi: 10.1167/17.2.9.
6
Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.左侧忽视时向左看:主动视觉选择局部图像特征进行注视时空间注意的作用。
Cortex. 2009 Nov-Dec;45(10):1156-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
7
Image complexity analysis with scanpath identification using remote gaze estimation model.使用远程注视估计模型进行扫描路径识别的图像复杂度分析
Multimed Tools Appl. 2020;79(33-34):24393-24412. doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-09117-9. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Impact of dual tasking on gaze behaviour and locomotor strategies adopted while circumventing virtual pedestrians during a collision avoidance task.双重任务对规避虚拟行人碰撞任务中注视行为和采用的运动策略的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Oct;240(10):2633-2645. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06427-2. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
Priming of fixations during recognition of natural scenes.自然场景识别过程中注视的启动。
J Vis. 2013 Feb 25;13(3):3. doi: 10.1167/13.3.3.
10
Task and context determine where you look.任务和环境决定你的关注点。
J Vis. 2007 Dec 19;7(14):16.1-20. doi: 10.1167/7.14.16.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural network models of autonomous adaptive intelligence and artificial general intelligence: how our brains learn large language models and their meanings.自主自适应智能与通用人工智能的神经网络模型:我们的大脑如何学习大语言模型及其含义。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30;19:1630151. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2025.1630151. eCollection 2025.
2
Point-SPV: end-to-end enhancement of object recognition in simulated prosthetic vision using synthetic viewing points.点-单目视觉假体:使用合成视点对模拟假体视觉中的目标识别进行端到端增强。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 24;19:1549698. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1549698. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
2
Memory representations in natural tasks.自然任务中的记忆表现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Winter;7(1):66-80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66.
3
What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition.显著性模型能对眼动做出哪些预测?编码和识别过程中注视的空间和顺序方面。
Cognitive load affects gaze dynamics during real-world tasks.
认知负荷会影响现实任务中的注视动态。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Mar 3;243(4):82. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07037-4.
4
When knowing the activity is not enough to predict gaze.当仅凭活动不足以预测注视时。
J Vis. 2024 Jul 2;24(7):6. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.7.6.
5
Scaffolding the human partner by contrastive guidance in an explanatory human-robot dialogue.在解释性人机对话中通过对比引导搭建人类伙伴的框架。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Oct 30;10:1236184. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1236184. eCollection 2023.
6
Feedback beyond accuracy: Using eye-tracking to detect comprehensibility and interest during reading.超越准确性的反馈:利用眼动追踪技术检测阅读过程中的可理解性和兴趣度。
J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;74(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/asi.24657. Epub 2022 May 24.
7
Stimulus salience conflicts and colludes with endogenous goals during urgent choices.在紧急选择过程中,刺激显著性与内在目标既相互冲突又相互影响。
iScience. 2023 Feb 21;26(3):106253. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106253. eCollection 2023 Mar 17.
8
Where do people look when walking up and down familiar staircases?当人们在熟悉的楼梯上上下下时,他们会看向哪里?
J Vis. 2023 Jan 3;23(1):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.1.7.
9
Head and eyes: Looking behavior in 12- to 24-month-old infants.头眼动作观察:12-24 月龄婴儿的注视行为。
J Vis. 2021 Aug 2;21(8):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.18.
10
Visuomotor control of leaping over a raised obstacle is sensitive to small baseline displacements.跨越凸起障碍物的视觉运动控制对小的基线位移很敏感。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Mar 10;8(3):201877. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201877.
J Vis. 2008 Feb 20;8(2):6.1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.2.6.
4
Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.任务需求能够立即逆转复杂视觉刺激中感官驱动显著性的影响。
J Vis. 2008 Feb 15;8(2):2.1-19. doi: 10.1167/8.2.2.
5
Task and context determine where you look.任务和环境决定你的关注点。
J Vis. 2007 Dec 19;7(14):16.1-20. doi: 10.1167/7.14.16.
6
The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.场景观看中的中央注视偏向:独立于运动偏向和图像特征分布选择最佳观看位置。
J Vis. 2007 Nov 21;7(14):4.1-17. doi: 10.1167/7.14.4.
7
Trade-offs between gaze and working memory use.注视与工作记忆使用之间的权衡。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Dec;33(6):1352-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1352.
8
Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes.视觉感知与自然场景的统计特性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:167-92. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085632.
9
Control of attention and gaze in complex environments.复杂环境中注意力与注视的控制
J Vis. 2006 Dec 15;6(12):1431-50. doi: 10.1167/6.12.9.
10
Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.构建场景要点:全局图像特征在识别中的作用。
Prog Brain Res. 2006;155:23-36. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)55002-2.