• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛在屠宰时有或无致昏情况下呼吸道中的血液。

Blood in the respiratory tract during slaughter with and without stunning in cattle.

作者信息

Gregory N G, Wenzlawowicz M von, Holleben K von

机构信息

BBSRC and Royal Veterinary College, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.

出版信息

Meat Sci. 2009 May;82(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.021. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.021
PMID:20416612
Abstract

Bovine respiratory tracts were examined for blood following shechita without stunning, halal slaughter without stunning, and captive bolt stunning with sticking. In all three methods the cattle were in the upright (standing) position at the start of bleeding. Those that had not been stunned continued to breathe during the early part of bleeding whilst those that were stunned were not breathing. Nineteen percent of the shechita, 58% of the halal and 21% of the stunned plus stuck cattle had blood lining the inner aspect of the trachea. Thirty six percent, 69% and 31% had blood in the upper bronchi, respectively. Ten percent, 19% and 0% had fine bright red blood-tinged foam in the trachea, respectively. It was concluded that concerns about suffering from airway irritation by blood could apply in animals that are either not stunned before slaughter or do not lose consciousness rapidly whilst blood is present in the respiratory tract.

摘要

对牛的呼吸道进行了检查,检查对象包括未经致昏的犹太教屠宰、未经致昏的清真屠宰以及电击致昏后放血的情况。在所有这三种方法中,放血开始时牛均处于直立(站立)姿势。那些未被致昏的牛在放血初期仍继续呼吸,而那些被致昏的牛则没有呼吸。19%的犹太教屠宰牛、58%的清真屠宰牛以及21%的电击致昏后放血的牛,其气管内表面有血液附着。上支气管中有血液的比例分别为36%、69%和31%。气管中有细小的鲜红色血性泡沫的比例分别为10%、19%和0%。得出的结论是,对于在屠宰前未被致昏或者在呼吸道中有血液时未迅速失去意识的动物,有可能会出现因血液刺激气道而遭受痛苦的情况。

相似文献

1
Blood in the respiratory tract during slaughter with and without stunning in cattle.牛在屠宰时有或无致昏情况下呼吸道中的血液。
Meat Sci. 2009 May;82(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.021. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
2
A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.一篇比较三种击晕-屠宰方法后瘤牛福利的报告。
Meat Sci. 2016 Jul;117:41-3. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
3
False aneurysms in carotid arteries of cattle and water buffalo during shechita and halal slaughter.牛和水牛在犹太教屠宰仪式和清真屠宰过程中颈动脉出现的假性动脉瘤。
Meat Sci. 2008 Jun;79(2):285-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
4
Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.用于评估犊牛在屠宰时无意识状态的指标的验证。
Animal. 2016 Sep;10(9):1457-65. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000422. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
5
The effects of electrical stunning and percussive captive bolt stunning on meat quality of cattle processed by Turkish slaughter procedures.电击晕和敲击式致昏对采用土耳其屠宰程序加工的牛的肉质的影响。
Meat Sci. 2004 Apr;66(4):809-15. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00191-8.
6
A comparison of the effects of electrical, captive bolt or percussion stunning on the incidence of blood splash in lambs.电晕、栓系枪击或击晕对羔羊血液飞溅发生率影响的比较。
Meat Sci. 1981 Nov;5(6):407-11. doi: 10.1016/0309-1740(81)90039-5.
7
Cortical function in cattle during slaughter: conventional captive bolt stunning followed by exsanguination compared with shechita slaughter.牛屠宰过程中的皮质功能:传统的栓式击晕后放血与犹太教屠宰方式的比较。
Vet Rec. 1988 Apr 2;122(14):325-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.122.14.325.
8
Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter.市场以及运输和屠宰过程中的动物福利。
Meat Sci. 2008 Sep;80(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 May 24.
9
[Physiologic reactions during the slaughter of cattle and sheep with and without stunning].[有或无电击晕情况下牛羊屠宰过程中的生理反应]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1989 Mar;96(3):89-92.
10
Factors which affect blood variables of slaughtered cattle.影响屠宰牛血液变量的因素。
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1994 Jun;65(2):41-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of Knife Sharpness during Slaughter: Shariah and Kosher Perspective and Scientific Validation.屠宰过程中刀具锋利度的重要性:伊斯兰教法和犹太洁食视角及科学验证
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 25;13(11):1751. doi: 10.3390/ani13111751.
2
Stunning Compliance in Halal Slaughter: A Review of Current Scientific Knowledge.清真屠宰中的致昏合规性:当前科学知识综述
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(19):3061. doi: 10.3390/ani13193061.
3
Agonic Aspiration of Blood: Not Useful as an Animal-Based Indicator of Electrical Stunning Ineffectiveness in Pigs ().
血液无电流抽吸:不能作为猪电击昏无效的基于动物的指标()。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 13;13(14):2292. doi: 10.3390/ani13142292.
4
Muscle's Chemical Composition, Fatty Acid Pattern, and Oxidative Stability in Korean Hanwoo Finishing Cattle Following Slaughtering and Stunning with or without Brain Disruption and State of Consciousness.韩国韩牛育肥牛屠宰及致昏(有无脑破坏和意识状态)后肌肉的化学成分、脂肪酸模式及氧化稳定性
Foods. 2023 Feb 22;12(5):928. doi: 10.3390/foods12050928.
5
Time to Loss of Behavioral and Brainstem Responses of Ducks following Non-Stunned Slaughter.非致晕屠宰后鸭行为和脑干反应丧失的时间。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Dec 11;11(12):3531. doi: 10.3390/ani11123531.
6
Pros and cons of different stunning methods from a Halal perspective: a review.从清真角度看不同致昏方法的利弊:综述
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 Oct 11;5(4):txab154. doi: 10.1093/tas/txab154. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Quality of Death in Fighting Bulls during Bullfights: Neurobiology and Physiological Responses.斗牛中斗牛的死亡质量:神经生物学与生理反应
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 27;11(10):2820. doi: 10.3390/ani11102820.
8
Effects of Slaughter Positions on Catecholamine, Blood Biochemical and Electroencephalogram Changes in Cattle Restrained Using a Modified Mark IV Box.屠宰体位对使用改良Mark IV箱约束的牛体内儿茶酚胺、血液生化指标及脑电图变化的影响
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;11(7):1979. doi: 10.3390/ani11071979.
9
Pain at the Slaughterhouse in Ruminants with a Focus on the Neurobiology of Sensitisation.反刍动物屠宰场中的疼痛,重点关注敏化的神经生物学
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;11(4):1085. doi: 10.3390/ani11041085.
10
A Review of Legal Regulation of Religious Slaughter in Australia: Failure to Regulate or a Regulatory Fail?澳大利亚宗教屠宰的法律监管综述:监管缺失还是监管不力?
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 30;10(9):1530. doi: 10.3390/ani10091530.