1Livestock Research,Wageningen University and Research Centre,P.O. Box 338,6700 AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
3Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht Unversity,P.O. Box 80154,3508 TD Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Animal. 2016 Sep;10(9):1457-65. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000422. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
European legislation states that after stunning regular checks should be performed to guarantee animals are unconscious between the end of the stunning process and death. When animals are killed without prior stunning these checks should be performed before the animal is released from restraint. The validity of certain indicators used to assess unconsciousness under different stunning and slaughter conditions is under debate. The aim of this study was to validate the absence of threat-, withdrawal-, corneal- and eyelid reflex as indicators to assess unconsciousness in calves subjected to different stunning and slaughter methods. Calves (201±22 kg) were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatments: (1) Captive bolt stunning followed by neck cut in an inverted position (n=25); (2) Non-stunned slaughter in an upright position (n=7); (3) Non-stunned slaughter in an inverted position (180° rotation) (n=25); (4) Non-stunned slaughter in an upright position followed by captive bolt stunning 40 s after the neck cut (n=25). Each calf was equipped with non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG) electrodes before the slaughter procedure. All reflexes were verified once before the slaughter procedure. At the beginning of the procedure (T=0 s) calves were stunned (treatment 1) or neck cut in an upright position (treatment 2, 4) or inverted position (treatment 3). Calves of treatment 4 were captive bolt stunned 34±8 s after the neck cut. Reflexes were assessed every 20 s from T=15 s for all treatments until all reflex tests resulted in a negative response three times in a row and a flat line EEG was observed. In addition, reflexes were assessed 5 s after captive bolt stunning in calves of treatments 1 and 4. Visual assessment of changes in the amplitude and frequency of EEG traces was used to determine loss of consciousness. Timing of loss of consciousness was related to timing of loss of reflexes. After captive bolt stunning, absence of threat-, withdrawal-, corneal- and eyelid reflex indicated unconsciousness as determined by EEG recordings. After non-stunned slaughter, both threat- and withdrawal reflex were on average lost before calves were unconscious based on EEG recordings. The eyelid- and corneal reflex were on average lost after calves had lost consciousness based on EEG recordings and appeared to be distinctly conservative indicators of unconsciousness in non-stunned slaughtered calves since they were observed until 76±50 and 85±45 s (mean±SD), respectively, after EEG-based loss of consciousness.
欧洲法规规定,在电击致昏后,应进行常规检查,以确保动物在致昏过程结束与死亡之间处于无意识状态。如果动物未经电击致昏而被宰杀,应在动物从约束状态中释放出来之前进行这些检查。在不同的电击和屠宰条件下,用于评估无意识状态的某些指标的有效性存在争议。本研究的目的是验证在不同电击和屠宰方法下,威胁反射、退缩反射、角膜反射和眼睑反射缺失作为评估牛犊无意识状态的指标的有效性。牛犊(201±22kg)被随机分配到以下四种处理之一:(1)在倒位进行击晕后颈部切割(n=25);(2)在直立位置不进行电击屠宰(n=7);(3)在 180°旋转的倒位进行不进行电击屠宰(n=25);(4)在直立位置不进行电击屠宰,颈部切割后 40s 进行击晕(n=25)。在屠宰程序之前,每头小牛都配备了非侵入性脑电图(EEG)电极。所有反射在屠宰程序之前都进行了一次验证。在程序开始时(T=0s),小牛被电击致晕(处理 1)或在直立位置进行颈部切割(处理 2、4)或倒位(处理 3)。处理 4 的小牛在颈部切割后 34±8s 进行击晕。对于所有处理,从 T=15s 开始,每 20s 评估一次反射,直到所有反射测试连续三次得出阴性反应,并且观察到脑电图呈平坦线。此外,在处理 1 和 4 的小牛电击致晕后 5s 评估反射。使用脑电图记录的振幅和频率变化的视觉评估来确定意识丧失。意识丧失的时间与反射丧失的时间有关。电击致晕后,威胁反射、退缩反射、角膜反射和眼睑反射的缺失表明根据脑电图记录无意识。非电击屠宰后,根据脑电图记录,威胁反射和退缩反射平均在牛犊无意识之前丧失,而根据脑电图记录,眼睑反射和角膜反射平均在牛犊失去意识后丧失,并且由于它们在 EEG 基于意识丧失后 76±50 和 85±45s(平均值±SD)分别观察到,因此它们似乎是非电击屠宰的无意识牛犊中明显保守的无意识指标。