• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

叙述性信息可以减少对大肠癌筛查的情感预测错误,降低感知障碍。

Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, 300 N Ingalls, 7B02, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038. Epub 2010 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038
PMID:20417005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4033575/
Abstract

Narratives from similar others may be an effective way to increase important health behaviors. In this study, we used a narrative intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening. Researchers have suggested that people may overestimate barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We recruited participants from the US, ages 49-60 who had never previously been screened for colorectal cancer, to read an educational message about screening for the disease. One-half of participants were randomly assigned to also receive a narrative within the message (control participants did not receive a narrative). The narrative intervention was developed according to predictions of affective forecasting theory. Compared to participants who received only the educational message, participants who received the message along with a narrative reported that the barriers to screening would have less of an impact on a future screening experience. The narrative also increased risk perception for colorectal cancer and interest in screening in the next year.

摘要

类似他人的叙述可能是增加重要健康行为的有效方式。在这项研究中,我们使用叙述干预来促进结直肠癌筛查。研究人员认为,人们可能高估了结直肠癌筛查的障碍。我们从美国招募了从未接受过结直肠癌筛查的 49-60 岁的参与者,让他们阅读一篇关于该疾病筛查的教育信息。一半的参与者被随机分配到也接受信息中的叙述(对照组没有收到叙述)。叙述干预是根据情感预测理论的预测制定的。与仅接受教育信息的参与者相比,同时接受信息和叙述的参与者报告说,筛查障碍对未来的筛查体验影响较小。叙述还增加了对结直肠癌的风险感知以及对下一年筛查的兴趣。

相似文献

1
Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.叙述性信息可以减少对大肠癌筛查的情感预测错误,降低感知障碍。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
2
Didactic and narrative persuasion: An experiment to promote colorectal cancer screening.说教和叙事说服:促进结直肠癌筛查的实验。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 May;16(2):497-514. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12501. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
3
How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.叙事如何影响结直肠癌筛查决策和参与:一个现实主义综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):327-337. doi: 10.1111/hex.12892. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Effectiveness of behavior change techniques to address barriers to follow-up colonoscopy: results from an online survey and randomized factorial experiment.行为改变技术解决结肠镜检查随访障碍的有效性:在线调查和随机析因实验的结果
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae083.
5
Gain versus loss-framed messaging and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: A preliminary examination of perceived racism and culturally targeted dual messaging.得失框架信息传递与非裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查:对感知种族主义和文化针对性双重信息传递的初步考察。
Br J Health Psychol. 2016 May;21(2):249-67. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12160. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Eligible Adults in Qatar and the Associated Factors: A Cross- Sectional Study.卡塔尔适宜人群对结直肠癌筛查的认知障碍及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):45-51. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.45.
7
Affective components of perceived risk mediate the relation between cognitively-based perceived risk and colonoscopy screening.感知风险的情感成分中介了基于认知的感知风险与结肠镜筛查之间的关系。
J Behav Med. 2020 Feb;43(1):121-130. doi: 10.1007/s10865-019-00049-w. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Prevalence of appropriate colorectal cancer screening and preferences for receiving screening advice among people attending outpatient clinics.参加门诊的人群中,适当的结直肠癌筛查的流行率以及对接受筛查建议的偏好。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Aug;42(4):334-339. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12776. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
The impact of supplementary narrative-based information on colorectal cancer screening beliefs and intention.基于叙述的补充信息对结直肠癌筛查信念和意愿的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 21;15:162. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1167-3.
10
Debiasing affective forecasting errors with targeted, but not representative, experience narratives.用针对性而非代表性的经验叙述消除情感预测误差。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Oct;99(10):1611-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Patient Education to Amplify Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States: Strategies and Implications.利用患者教育扩大美国的结直肠癌筛查:策略与影响
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Jul 26. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02482-1.
2
Efficacy of mobile-based educational intervention using Instructional Systems Design in promoting preventive behaviors for sexually transmitted infections among Iranian women: a randomized controlled trial.基于移动的教育干预措施使用教学设计在促进伊朗妇女预防性传播感染行为方面的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 17;24(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18002-1.
3
Associations between COVID-19 risk perceptions, behavior intentions and worry.2019冠状病毒病风险认知、行为意图与担忧之间的关联
Health Psychol Rep. 2022 Mar 21;10(2):139-148. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2022.114477. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and evaluation of a website with patients experiences of multiple sclerosis: a mixed methods study.开发并评估一个包含多发性硬化症患者体验的网站:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02663-9.
5
Web-Based Behavioral Intervention Utilizing Narrative Persuasion for HIV Prevention Among Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men (HeHe Talks Project): Intervention Development.基于网络的行为干预利用叙事说服预防男男性行为人群中的 HIV(HeHe Talks 项目):干预开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 16;23(9):e22312. doi: 10.2196/22312.
6
Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making.利用叙事来纠正小儿气管切开术决策中的预测错误。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Apr;41(3):305-316. doi: 10.1177/0272989X21990693. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Impact of a multimedia website with patient experiences of multiple sclerosis (PExMS) on immunotherapy decision-making: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial in a mixed-methods design.一个包含多发性硬化症患者体验(PExMS)的多媒体网站对免疫治疗决策的影响:一项混合方法设计的试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00749-0.
8
Examining Long-Term Effects of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Recommendation Messages: A 4-Month Follow-Up Survey of a Randomized Controlled Study in Japan.审视人乳头瘤病毒疫苗推荐信息的长期影响:日本一项随机对照研究的4个月随访调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;8(4):549. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040549.
9
A Randomized Trial of Theory-Informed Appeals for Organ Donor Registration Using Internet Advertisements.一项使用互联网广告进行基于理论的器官捐赠登记呼吁的随机试验。
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Sep 12;5(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.09.013. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
"Worse than I anticipated" or "This isn't so bad"?: The impact of affective forecasting accuracy on self-reported task performance.“比我预想的还要糟糕”还是“这没那么糟糕”:情感预测准确性对自我报告任务表现的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 13;15(7):e0235973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235973. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.叙事信息会影响个体的决策吗?一项系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2079-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.037. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
2
Personal stories in publicly available patient decision aids.公开可用的患者决策辅助工具中的个人故事。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):456-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.035. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
3
Colorectal cancer test use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.2005年美国国家健康访谈调查中的结直肠癌检测使用情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jul;17(7):1623-30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2838.
4
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.《2008年结直肠癌和腺瘤性息肉早期检测的筛查与监测:美国癌症协会、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组及美国放射学会联合指南》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun;58(3):130-60. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0018. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
5
Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: a framework to guide research and application.癌症预防与控制中的叙事沟通:指导研究与应用的框架
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Jun;33(3):221-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02879904.
6
Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination.风险认知:评估及其与流感疫苗接种的关系。
Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):146-51. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.146.
7
Cancer statistics, 2007.2007年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.
8
Determinants of colorectal cancer screening use, attempts, and non-use.结直肠癌筛查的使用、尝试及未使用的决定因素。
Prev Med. 2007 May;44(5):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
9
Resisting good news: reactions to breast cancer risk communication.抗拒好消息:对乳腺癌风险沟通的反应
Health Commun. 2006;19(2):115-23. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1902_3.
10
Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy.结肠镜筛查不依从性的预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):989-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00164.x.