Seto Ayako, Takenaka Ichiro, Aoyama Kazuyoshi, Iwagaki Tamao, Ishimura Hiroshi, Takenaka Yukari, Kadoya Tatsuo
Department of Anesthesia, Nippon Steel Yawata Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu 805-8508.
Masui. 2010 Apr;59(4):525-30.
There are some disadvantages of the Airway Scope (AWS), and the most crucial one is that the AWS has only one fixed-size AWS blade. When the blade is too short to reach beneath the epiglottis and to lift it directly, an endotracheal tube hits the epiglottis and cannot be advanced into the glottic aperture even when it is visible. A bougie may solve this difficulty because its angulated tip can be controlled in a desired direction. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of the bougie on this problem.
Forty patients were randomly classified into two groups: intubation with only the AWS, and with the AWS and the bougie. After general anesthesia and muscle relaxation, the AWS blade tip was positioned in the vallecula, the glottis was fully exposed, and intubation using the AWS with or without a bougie was performed. Success rate and time to intubation were compared in both groups.
Success rate was 13/20 in intubation with only the AWS and 19/20 in intubation with the AWS and the bougie (P<0.05). Median intubation time was reduced from 48 sec without the bougie to 29 sec with the bougie (P<0.01).
Use of the bougie was useful for difficult intubation with the AWS caused by inability to lift the epiglottis directly.
气道镜(AWS)存在一些缺点,其中最关键的一点是AWS只有一种固定尺寸的镜片。当镜片过短无法到达会厌下方并直接抬起会厌时,即使气管导管可见,它也会碰到会厌,无法推进至声门裂。探条可能会解决这一难题,因为其成角的尖端可以朝所需方向操控。因此,我们研究了探条在解决这一问题上的有效性。
40例患者被随机分为两组:仅使用AWS插管组和使用AWS及探条插管组。全身麻醉和肌肉松弛后,将AWS镜片尖端置于会厌谷,充分暴露声门,然后使用带或不带探条的AWS进行插管。比较两组的成功率和插管时间。
仅使用AWS插管的成功率为13/20,使用AWS及探条插管的成功率为19/20(P<0.05)。插管中位时间从无探条时的48秒降至有探条时的29秒(P<0.01)。
对于因无法直接抬起会厌而导致的AWS困难插管,使用探条是有效的。