Takenaka Ichiro, Aoyama Kazuyoshi, Iwagaki Tamao, Takenaka Yukari
Department of Anesthesia, Kyushu Rosai Hospital, 1-1 Sonekita, Kokuraminami, Kitakyushu, 800-0296, Japan.
Department of Anesthesia, Kitakyushu General Hospital, 1-1 Higashijono, Kokurakita, Kitakyushu, 802-8517, Japan.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0424-1.
When encountering a difficult airway with an Airway Scope (AWS) a bougie can be inserted into the endotracheal tube in the AWS channel. The angulated tip of the bougie can be guided toward the glottis by rotating it. We tested the ease of rotating bougies (Venn reusable, Boussignac, Portex single-use, and Frova) in an endotracheal tube when placed in the AWS channel.
Bench study: Seven anesthesiologists inserted each of the four types of bougies into a 7.0 mm endotracheal tube in an AWS channel and rotated the bougie end (side of bougie operated by hand) clockwise or counterclockwise to an angle of 0°-180° in 45° increments. The rotation angle of the bougie tip (tracheal side) was measured for each bougie and the degree of force required to rotate them was examined. Manikin study: Using the same four bougies, the same seven anesthesiologists attempted to intubate a manikin that simulated a difficult airway. Success rate and time required for successful intubation were compared between the four bougies.
Bench study: The difference in the rotation angle between the bougie tip and end was significantly larger with Portex single-use and Frova bougies than with Venn reusable and Boussignac bougies (P < 0.01). The rotation angles of the tips of Venn reusable, Boussignac, Portex single-use, and Frova bougies were 145°/123° (clockwise / counterclockwise), 92°/108°, 46°/56°, and 39°/51°, respectively, when their ends were rotated to an angle of 180°. Venn reusable and Boussignac bougies could be rotated in the endotracheal tube by clinically acceptable rotational force. Manikin study: Times to intubation with Venn reusable [25 (SD, 5) s] and Boussignac bougies [35 (6) s] were significantly shorter than with Portex single-use [61 (17) s] and Frova bougies [69 (22) s] (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in success rate between the four bougies.
Venn reusable and Boussignac bougies are a useful aid for intubation with an AWS. Portex single-use and Frova bougies seem to be less suitable for this technique. Different bougies may be of varying utility when used with an AWS or airway device with an endotracheal tube channel.
当使用气道镜(AWS)遇到困难气道时,可将探条插入AWS通道内的气管导管。通过旋转探条,可将其成角尖端导向声门。我们测试了将四种探条(Venn可重复使用型、Boussignac型、Portex一次性使用型和Frova型)置于AWS通道内的气管导管中时旋转的难易程度。
实验台研究:7名麻醉医生将四种类型的探条分别插入AWS通道内的7.0mm气管导管中,并将探条末端(手动操作的一侧)顺时针或逆时针以45°增量旋转至0°-180°角。测量每种探条探条尖端(气管侧)的旋转角度,并检查旋转所需的力的大小。人体模型研究:使用相同的四种探条,同样的7名麻醉医生尝试对模拟困难气道的人体模型进行插管。比较四种探条的成功率和成功插管所需的时间。
实验台研究:Portex一次性使用型和Frova型探条的探条尖端与末端之间的旋转角度差异明显大于Venn可重复使用型和Boussignac型探条(P<0.01)。当Venn可重复使用型、Boussignac型、Portex一次性使用型和Frova型探条的末端旋转至180°角时,其尖端的旋转角度分别为145°/123°(顺时针/逆时针)、92°/108°、46°/56°和39°/51°。Venn可重复使用型和Boussignac型探条可通过临床上可接受的旋转力在气管导管中旋转。人体模型研究:Venn可重复使用型探条[25(标准差,5)秒]和Boussignac型探条[35(6)秒]的插管时间明显短于Portex一次性使用型探条[61(17)秒]和Frova型探条[69(22)秒](P<0.01)。四种探条之间的成功率无显著差异。
Venn可重复使用型和Boussignac型探条有助于使用AWS进行插管。Portex一次性使用型和Frova型探条似乎不太适合这种技术。当与AWS或带有气管导管通道的气道装置一起使用时,不同的探条可能具有不同的效用。