Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, Mt Coot-tha Road, Toowong, Queensland 4066, Australia.
Ecology. 2010 Mar;91(3):681-92. doi: 10.1890/08-2356.1.
Existing theoretical frameworks suggest three predictions relevant to grazing effects in Australian aridlands: grazing has a negative but moderate effect on plant species richness; a separate "state" resulting from degradation caused by extreme grazing will be evident; some plant species will have a strong association with grazing relief refuges that have only ever been subject to light grazing. These predictions were examined in the dune swales of an Australian desert, with data on herbaceous species collected along transects up to 14 km from artificial water points between four and 33 years old. A cumulative grazing index was constructed utilizing both the spatial occupation patterns of cattle and the length of exposure. Despite restricting sampling to a narrow habitat, silt/clay content and soil pH influence floristic patterns independent of grazing. The analysis of quadrat data in relation to grazing revealed almost no patterns in plant cover, species richness (at two different scales), or abundance across plant life-form groups. Five species had an increasing response, and seven a decreasing response, while the only species restricted to areas of extremely low grazing pressure was sufficiently rare that it could have occurred there by chance. The dominant annual grass, the most common shrub, and a perennial tussock-forming sedge all decrease with high levels of grazing. Most species exhibit an ephemeral life strategy in response to unreliable rainfall, and this boom and bust strategy effectively doubles as an adaptation to grazing. After 20 years of exposure to managed grazing with domestic stock in Australian dune swales, patterns in species richness have not emerged in response to grazing pressure, the ecosystem has not been transformed to another degradation "state," and there is no evidence that grazing relief refuges provide havens for species highly sensitive to grazing.
放牧对植物物种丰富度有负面影响,但影响程度适中;由于极端放牧导致的退化会产生一个单独的“状态”;一些植物物种将与放牧缓解避难所密切相关,这些避难所只受到轻度放牧的影响。这些预测在澳大利亚沙漠的沙丘洼地中进行了检验,在距离人工水源 4 到 33 年的 14 公里长的样带上,收集了草本物种的数据。利用牛的空间占据模式和暴露长度构建了累积放牧指数。尽管将采样限制在狭窄的栖息地内,但淤泥/粘土含量和土壤 pH 值会独立于放牧影响植物区系模式。对与放牧有关的样方数据的分析表明,植物盖度、物种丰富度(在两个不同的尺度上)或植物生活型组的丰度几乎没有模式。五种物种的响应呈增加趋势,七种物种的响应呈减少趋势,而唯一一种局限于极低放牧压力区域的物种由于过于稀少,可能是偶然出现在那里的。占优势的一年生草、最常见的灌木和多年生丛生莎草随着高水平的放牧而减少。大多数物种表现出短暂的生活策略,以应对不可靠的降雨,这种兴衰策略实际上是对放牧的一种适应。在澳大利亚沙丘洼地中,经过 20 年的有管理放牧和家畜的暴露,物种丰富度没有因放牧压力而出现模式,生态系统也没有转变为另一种退化“状态”,也没有证据表明放牧缓解避难所提供了对放牧高度敏感的物种的避难所。