Suppr超能文献

食管穿孔的处理。

Management of esophageal perforations.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2809-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1054-6. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforations remain a life-threatening event requiring rapid diagnosis and treatment. Surgical repair and interventional endoscopic or conservative treatment are the common treatment methods.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2006, the authors retrospectively analyzed 62 patients treated for esophageal perforation. Data were evaluated for cause of perforation, symptoms, therapeutic regimen, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The causes of perforation were iatrogenic or suicidal (n = 33) or spontaneous (n = 29). In the first group, the causes were dilation of stenosis (n = 16), endoscopy (n = 7), transesophageal echography (n = 4), ingestion of acid or leach (n = 2), intubation (n = 2), ingestion of a foreign body (n = 1), and migration of a screw after osteosynthesis (n = 1). The spontaneous perforations were caused by tumors (n = 19), Boerhaave syndrome (n = 6), unknown origin (n = 3), and Barrett's ulcer (n = 1). The most frequent symptoms were dysphagia (n = 50), pain (n = 35), fever (n = 24), and vomiting (n = 18). At the time of perforation, 28 patients presented with cancer. Of these 28 patients, 18 had esophageal cancer. The treatment included surgery (n = 32), which consisted of double-layer suture (n = 26) or esophageal resection (n = 6). A total of 30 patients were treated interventionally with a stent (n = 21), clips (n = 1), or without further measures (n = 8). The patients in the surgery group presented with severe primary and postoperative general conditions including renal failure (25%), respiratory insufficiency (65.5%), and need for catecholamines (62.5%). This multiorgan involvement was found only occasionally in the conservative group. The overall hospital mortality rate was 14.5%, involving 9 patients (5 in the surgery group and 4 in the conservative group). Early treatment led to better survival than late treatment with a delay exceeding 24 h.

CONCLUSION

The treatment method still must be chosen on an individual basis. It appears that surgical treatment is necessary in cases of severe general conditions. The data from this study show that surgical repair and conservative treatment may be used successfully. The best outcome was obtained after immediate treatment.

摘要

背景

食管穿孔仍然是一种危及生命的事件,需要快速诊断和治疗。手术修复和介入内镜或保守治疗是常见的治疗方法。

方法

作者回顾性分析了 1998 年至 2006 年间 62 例食管穿孔患者的资料。评估了穿孔的原因、症状、治疗方案、并发症和死亡率。

结果

穿孔的原因是医源性或自杀性(n = 33)或自发性(n = 29)。在第一组中,原因是狭窄扩张(n = 16)、内镜检查(n = 7)、经食管超声心动图(n = 4)、酸或浸蚀物摄入(n = 2)、插管(n = 2)、异物摄入(n = 1)和骨合成后螺钉迁移(n = 1)。自发性穿孔由肿瘤(n = 19)、Boerhaave 综合征(n = 6)、不明原因(n = 3)和 Barrett 溃疡(n = 1)引起。最常见的症状是吞咽困难(n = 50)、疼痛(n = 35)、发热(n = 24)和呕吐(n = 18)。穿孔时,28 例患者表现为癌症。其中 18 例为食管癌。治疗包括手术(n = 32),包括双层缝合(n = 26)或食管切除术(n = 6)。共有 30 例患者接受支架治疗(n = 21)、夹(n = 1)或不进一步治疗(n = 8)。手术组患者表现出严重的原发性和术后全身状况,包括肾衰竭(25%)、呼吸功能不全(65.5%)和需要儿茶酚胺(62.5%)。这种多器官受累仅在保守组中偶尔发现。总的住院死亡率为 14.5%,涉及 9 例患者(手术组 5 例,保守组 4 例)。早期治疗比延迟超过 24 小时的治疗有更好的生存结果。

结论

治疗方法仍必须根据个人情况选择。对于严重全身状况的患者,手术治疗似乎是必要的。本研究的数据表明,手术修复和保守治疗都可以成功应用。立即治疗可获得最佳结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验