Ellias Y A, Elias M A, Gorey T F
Basrah Teaching Hospital, Iraq.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 May;73(3):185-8.
Early septic complications were studied in 292 patients operated on for penetrating missile injury of the abdomen with involvement of either the spleen or the liver, at Basrah Teaching Hospital between January 1983 and April 1986. Depending on associated injuries, patients with splenectomy were divided into three groups, the first with isolated splenic injury, the second with splenic and associated extra-intestinal organ injury, and the third with splenic and intestinal injuries with or without extra-intestinal organ injury. Patients with hepatic injury were classified similarly. Splenectomy was carried out for any degree of splenic injury. Grade I hepatic injuries were managed by débridement and suturing while major grades II-IV underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy. Patients were considered septic if they had any three of four clinical criteria: temperature higher than 39 degrees C; significant haemodynamic deterioration; respiratory alkalosis, or oliguria. Of the total, 79 were excluded due to: early transfer 51, incomplete records 8, perioperative death 11, and having combined splenic and hepatic injuries 9 (excluded by definition), leaving 104 (74.8%) patients with splenectomy and 109 (71.1%) with hepatic injury available for study. Sepsis developed in 48 (46.1%) of patients after splenectomy and in 28 (25.7%) with hepatic injury. This difference was significant (P greater than 0.005). In patients with isolated splenic injury, eight (25.8%) were septic while three (13.6%) of those with isolated hepatic injury developed sepsis. This was not significant (P = 0.32, Fisher's exact test). When either was associated with an injury to an extra-intestinal organ, 15 (50%) of the splenectomy group developed sepsis compared to five (23.8%) of the hepatic injury group. This did not reach significance. When either was associated with intestinal injury, sepsis developed in 25 (58.1%) of the splenectomy patients, in contrast to 20 (30.3%) of patients with hepatic injury. This was significant (P < 0.005). Gram-negative coliforms were the most common organisms isolated comprising 72.5% and 67.8%, in contrast to pneumococci isolated in 5.9% and 3.6% in the splenectomy group and hepatic injury group, respectively.In conclusion, in patients with penetrating missile injuries of the abdomen, the risk of sepsis is increased after splenectomy compared to hepatic injury, only if there was associated bowel injury. This was reflected in the type of causative organism (predominantly enteric flora) despite 'appropriate'antibiotic cover, as well as a fivefold increase in mortality among the splenectomy group. We suggest that splenic salvage, where feasible, is mandatory if associated with intestinal injury.
1983年1月至1986年4月期间,在巴士拉教学医院,对292例因腹部穿透性导弹伤累及脾脏或肝脏而接受手术的患者的早期脓毒症并发症进行了研究。根据合并损伤情况,脾切除术患者分为三组,第一组为单纯脾损伤,第二组为脾及合并的肠外器官损伤,第三组为脾及肠损伤,伴有或不伴有肠外器官损伤。肝损伤患者也进行了类似分类。任何程度的脾损伤均行脾切除术。Ⅰ级肝损伤采用清创缝合处理,而Ⅱ - Ⅳ级严重损伤则行节段切除术或肝叶切除术。如果患者符合以下四项临床标准中的任意三项,即被视为发生脓毒症:体温高于39摄氏度;明显的血流动力学恶化;呼吸性碱中毒或少尿。其中,共有79例被排除,原因如下:早期转院51例、记录不完整8例、围手术期死亡11例以及合并脾和肝损伤9例(根据定义排除),剩余104例(74.8%)行脾切除术的患者和109例(71.1%)肝损伤患者可供研究。脾切除术后48例(46.1%)患者发生脓毒症,肝损伤患者中有28例(25.7%)发生脓毒症。这种差异具有显著性(P大于0.005)。在单纯脾损伤患者中,8例(25.8%)发生脓毒症,而单纯肝损伤患者中有3例(13.6%)发生脓毒症。这无显著性差异(P = 0.32,Fisher精确检验)。当二者合并肠外器官损伤时,脾切除组15例(50%)发生脓毒症,而肝损伤组为5例(23.8%)。这未达到显著性差异。当二者合并肠损伤时,脾切除患者中有25例(58.1%)发生脓毒症,相比之下,肝损伤患者中有20例(30.3%)发生脓毒症。这具有显著性(P < 0.005)。革兰氏阴性大肠菌是最常见的分离菌,在脾切除组和肝损伤组中分别占72.5%和67.8%,相比之下,肺炎球菌在脾切除组和肝损伤组中分别分离出5.9%和3.6%。总之,在腹部穿透性导弹伤患者中,仅在合并肠损伤时,脾切除术后脓毒症风险高于肝损伤。这在致病微生物类型(主要是肠道菌群)中有所体现,尽管使用了“适当的”抗生素预防,并且脾切除组死亡率增加了五倍。我们建议,如果可行,在合并肠损伤时必须尽量保留脾脏。