Department of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 May;31(5):1185-94. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22143.
To assess the accuracy and repeatability of Fourier velocity encoded (FVE) M-mode and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast with through-plane velocity encoding (2D-PC) for pulse wave velocity (PWV) evaluation in the descending aorta using five different analysis techniques.
Accuracy experiments were conducted on a tubular human-tissue-mimicking phantom integrated into a flow simulator. The theoretical PWV value was derived from the Moens-Korteweg equation after measurement of the tube elastic modulus by uniaxial tensile testing (PWV = 6.6 +/- 0.7 m/s). Repeatability was assessed on 20 healthy volunteers undergoing three consecutive MR examinations.
FVE M-mode PWV was more repeatable than 2D-PC PWV independently of the analysis technique used. The early systolic fit (ESF) method, followed by the maximum of the first derivative (1st der.) method, was the most accurate (PWV = 6.8 +/- 0.4 m/s and PWV = 7.0 +/- 0.6 m/s, respectively) and repeatable (inter-scan within-subject variation delta = 0.096 and delta = 0.107, respectively) for FVE M-mode. For 2D-PC, the 1st der. method performed best in terms of accuracy (PWV = 6.8 +/- 1.1 m/s), whereas the ESF algorithm was the most repeatable (delta = 0.386).
FVE M-mode allows rapid, accurate and repeatable central PWV evaluation when the ESF algorithm is used. 2D-PC requires long scan times and can provide accurate although much less repeatable PWV measurements when the 1st der. method is used.
评估傅里叶速度编码(FVE)M 模式和二维(2D)相位对比与平面内速度编码(2D-PC)在降主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)评估中的准确性和可重复性,使用五种不同的分析技术。
在集成到流动模拟器中的管状人体组织模拟体上进行准确性实验。通过单轴拉伸试验测量管的弹性模量后,从 Moens-Korteweg 方程得出理论 PWV 值(PWV=6.6±0.7 m/s)。在 20 名健康志愿者中进行了三次连续的磁共振检查,以评估重复性。
FVE M 模式 PWV 比 2D-PC PWV 更具可重复性,而与使用的分析技术无关。早期收缩拟合(ESF)方法,其次是一阶导数(1st der.)方法,是最准确的(PWV=6.8±0.4 m/s 和 PWV=7.0±0.6 m/s)和可重复的(FVE M 模式的扫描内个体间变异 delta=0.096 和 delta=0.107)。对于 2D-PC,1st der. 方法在准确性方面表现最佳(PWV=6.8±1.1 m/s),而 ESF 算法最具可重复性(delta=0.386)。
当使用 ESF 算法时,FVE M 模式允许快速、准确和可重复的中心 PWV 评估。2D-PC 需要较长的扫描时间,并且当使用 1st der. 方法时,虽然可重复性较差,但可以提供准确的 PWV 测量值。