Roberts Paul A, Cowan Brett R, Liu Yingmin, Lin Aaron C W, Nielsen Poul M F, Taberner Andrew J, Stewart Ralph A H, Lam Hoi Ieng, Young Alistair A
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Anatomy with Radiology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Oct 5;17:86. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0191-4.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV), a measure of arterial stiffness, has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This can be derived non-invasively using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Changes in PWV during exercise may reveal further information on vascular pathology. However, most known CMR methods for quantifying PWV are currently unsuitable for exercise stress testing.
A velocity-sensitive real-time acquisition and evaluation (RACE) pulse sequence was adapted to provide interleaved acquisition of two locations in the descending aorta (at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation and above the renal arteries) at 7.8 ms temporal resolution. An automated method was used to calculate the foot-to-foot transit time of the velocity pulse wave. The RACE method was validated against a standard gated phase contrast (STD) method in flexible tube phantoms using a pulsatile flow pump. The method was applied in 50 healthy volunteers (28 males) aged 22-75 years using a MR-compatible cycle ergometer to achieve moderate work rate (38 ± 22 W, with a 31 ± 12 bpm increase in heart rate) in the supine position. Central pulse pressures were estimated using a MR-compatible brachial device. Scan-rescan reproducibility was evaluated in nine volunteers.
Phantom PWV was 22 m/s (STD) vs. 26 ± 5 m/s (RACE) for a butyl rubber tube, and 5.5 vs. 6.1 ± 0.3 m/s for a latex rubber tube. In healthy volunteers PWV increased with age at both rest (R(2) = 0.31 p < 0.001) and exercise (R(2) = 0.40, p < 0.001). PWV was significantly increased at exercise relative to rest (0.71 ± 2.2 m/s, p = 0.04). Scan-rescan reproducibility at rest was -0.21 ± 0.68 m/s (n = 9).
This study demonstrates the validity of CMR in the evaluation of PWV during exercise in healthy subjects. The results support the feasibility of using this method in evaluating of patients with systemic aortic disease.
脉搏波速度(PWV)是动脉僵硬度的一种测量指标,已被证明是心血管不良事件的独立预测因子。这可以通过心血管磁共振(CMR)非侵入性地获得。运动期间PWV的变化可能揭示有关血管病变的更多信息。然而,目前大多数已知的用于量化PWV的CMR方法不适用于运动应激测试。
采用速度敏感实时采集与评估(RACE)脉冲序列,以7.8毫秒的时间分辨率对降主动脉的两个位置(肺动脉分叉水平和肾动脉上方)进行交错采集。使用自动化方法计算速度脉搏波的峰峰传输时间。在使用脉动流泵的柔性管模型中,将RACE方法与标准门控相位对比(STD)方法进行验证。该方法应用于50名年龄在22至75岁之间的健康志愿者(28名男性),使用与磁共振兼容的自行车测力计,使其在仰卧位达到中等工作强度(38±22瓦,心率增加31±12次/分钟)。使用与磁共振兼容的肱动脉装置估计中心脉压。在9名志愿者中评估扫描-重扫的可重复性。
对于丁基橡胶管,模型中的PWV为22米/秒(STD),而RACE方法测得的为26±5米/秒;对于乳胶橡胶管,分别为5.5米/秒和6.1±0.3米/秒。在健康志愿者中,静息时(R² = 0.31,p < 0.001)和运动时(R² = 0.40,p < 0.001)PWV均随年龄增加。运动时的PWV相对于静息时显著增加(0.71±2.2米/秒,p = 0.04)。静息时扫描-重扫的可重复性为-0.21±0.68米/秒(n = 9)。
本研究证明了CMR在评估健康受试者运动期间PWV方面的有效性。结果支持了使用该方法评估系统性主动脉疾病患者的可行性。