• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的学习曲线:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术协会的结果。

The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.

机构信息

Department of Urologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024
PMID:20434830
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has evolved as a minimally invasive alternative to open radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the learning curve for RARC by evaluating results from a multicenter, contemporary, consecutive series of patients who underwent this procedure.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Utilizing the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium database, a prospectively maintained and institutional review board-approved database, we identified 496 patients who underwent RARC by 21 surgeons at 14 institutions from 2003 to 2009.

MEASUREMENTS

Cut-off points for operative time, lymph node yield (LNY), estimated blood loss (EBL), and margin positivity were identified. Using specifically designed statistical mixed models, we were able to inversely predict the number of patients required for an institution to reach the predetermined cut-off points.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Mean operative time was 386 min, mean EBL was 408 ml, and mean LNY was 18. Overall, 34 of 482 patients (7%) had a positive surgical margin (PSM). Using statistical models, it was estimated that 21 patients were required for operative time to reach 6.5h and 8, 20, and 30 patients were required to reach an LNY of 12, 16, and 20, respectively. For all patients, PSM rates of <5% were achieved after 30 patients. For patients with pathologic stage higher than T2, PSM rates of <15% were achieved after 24 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RARC is a challenging procedure but is a technique that is reproducible throughout multiple centers. This report helps to define the learning curve for RARC and demonstrates an acceptable level of proficiency by the 30th case for proxy measures of RARC quality.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)已成为浸润性膀胱癌患者的一种微创替代开放根治性膀胱切除术。

目的

通过评估一组接受该手术的多中心、连续、同期患者的结果,我们旨在确定 RARC 的学习曲线。

设计、地点和参与者:利用国际机器人膀胱癌切除术协会数据库,这是一个前瞻性维护和机构审查委员会批准的数据库,我们从 2003 年至 2009 年确定了 14 个机构的 21 名外科医生对 496 例患者进行了 RARC。

测量

确定手术时间、淋巴结产量(LNY)、估计失血量(EBL)和切缘阳性的截止点。使用专门设计的统计混合模型,我们能够反向预测机构达到预定截止点所需的患者数量。

结果和局限性

平均手术时间为 386 分钟,平均 EBL 为 408ml,平均 LNY 为 18。总体而言,482 例患者中有 34 例(7%)有阳性手术切缘(PSM)。使用统计模型,估计需要 21 例患者才能达到 6.5 小时的手术时间,需要 8、20 和 30 例患者才能达到 12、16 和 20 的 LNY。对于所有患者,在 30 例患者后达到<5%的 PSM 率。对于病理分期高于 T2 的患者,在 24 例患者后达到<15%的 PSM 率。

结论

RARC 是一项具有挑战性的手术,但它是一种可在多个中心重复的技术。本报告有助于确定 RARC 的学习曲线,并通过第 30 例患者证明了 RARC 质量的代理测量的可接受水平的熟练程度。

相似文献

1
The learning curve of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的学习曲线:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术协会的结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.024. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
2
Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术时的淋巴结切除术:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
BJU Int. 2011 Feb;107(4):642-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09473.x.
3
Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的手术切缘状态:来自国际机器人膀胱切除术联盟的结果。
J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 15.
4
Does previous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy experience affect outcomes at robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium.既往机器人辅助前列腺根治术经验是否会影响机器人辅助膀胱癌根治术的结果?来自国际机器人膀胱癌根治术协会的研究结果。
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
5
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative and pathologic outcomes in Japan.机器人与开放根治性膀胱切除术:日本的围手术期和病理结果的前瞻性比较。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul;42(7):625-31. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys062. Epub 2012 May 11.
6
Robot-assisted pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer--where have we reached by 2009.机器人辅助膀胱癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术——2009 年我们已经达到了什么水平。
Urology. 2010 Jun;75(6):1269-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
7
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in female patients: technique with preservation of the uterus and vagina.女性患者的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术及尿流改道术:保留子宫和阴道的技术
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Mar;198(3):386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.010.
8
Oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: critical review of current status.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能学结果:现状的批判性评价。
Urology. 2011 Nov;78(5):977-84. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.073. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
9
Status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的现状。
Can J Urol. 2010 Feb;17(1):5002-11.
10
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and an analysis of factors influencing complications.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿流改道术的临床疗效及并发症影响因素分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1592406. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1592406. eCollection 2025.
2
Learning Curves in Robotic Urological Oncological Surgery: Has Anything Changed During the Last Five Years?机器人泌尿外科肿瘤手术的学习曲线:过去五年有什么变化吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;17(8):1334. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081334.
3
A review and meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy in elderly bladder cancer patients.
一项综述与荟萃分析:比较机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在老年膀胱癌患者中的疗效
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02323-3.
4
Impact of lymph node dissection on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.淋巴结清扫对机器人辅助膀胱癌根治性切除术患者手术和肿瘤学结局的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01893-y.
5
Global research trends of the application of artificial intelligence in bladder cancer since the 21st century: a bibliometric analysis.21世纪以来人工智能在膀胱癌中应用的全球研究趋势:一项文献计量分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 29;13:1227152. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227152. eCollection 2023.
6
Minimizing the learning curve for robotic-assisted radical cystectomy A single-surgeon, retrospective, cohort study.尽量缩短机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的学习曲线:一项单术者回顾性队列研究。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Sep;17(9):E252-E256. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8279.
7
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal reconstruction of urinary diversion by mechanical stapler: prospective evaluation of early and late complications.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术并使用机械吻合器进行体内尿流改道重建:早期和晚期并发症的前瞻性评估
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 13;10:1157684. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1157684. eCollection 2023.
8
Efficacy and Safety of the "Trisection Method" Training System for Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy at a Single Institution in Japan.日本单机构机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术“三分法”训练系统的疗效和安全性。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Nov 29;29(12):9294-9304. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120728.
9
The learning curve for robot-assisted radical cystectomy with total intracorporeal urinary diversion based on radical cystectomy pentafecta.基于根治性膀胱切除术五项标准的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术加完全体内尿流改道术的学习曲线
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 18;12:975444. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.975444. eCollection 2022.
10
Saudi Urological Association consensus guidelines on the use of robotic surgery in urology.沙特泌尿外科协会关于泌尿外科机器人手术应用的共识指南。
Urol Ann. 2022 Jul-Sep;14(3):199-204. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_46_22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.