Suppr超能文献

成人脊柱侧弯中腰椎前凸的放射学测量的可靠性分析:6 种方法的病例对照研究。

Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Scoliosis Research Institute, Korea University Guro Hospital, 80 Guro-Dong, Guro-Gu, Seoul 152-703, South Korea.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1551-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1422-x. Epub 2010 May 1.

Abstract

Several methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. In adult scoliosis patients, the measurement is difficult due to degenerative changes in the vertebral endplate as well as the coronal and sagittal deformity. We did the observational study with three examiners to determine the reliability of six methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis patients. Ninety lateral lumbar radiographs were collected for the study. The radiographs were divided into normal (Cobb < 10 degrees ), low-grade (Cobb 10 degrees -19 degrees ), high-grade (Cobb >or= 20 degrees ) group to determine the reliability of Cobb L1-S1, Cobb L1-L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1-S1, posterior tangent L1-L5 and TRALL method in adult scoliosis. The 90 lateral radiographs were measured twice by each of the three examiners using the six measurement methods. The data was analyzed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. In general, for the six radiographic methods, the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all >or=0.82. A comparison of the ICCs and 95% CI for the inter- and intra-observer reliability between the groups with varying degrees of scoliosis showed that, the reliability of the lordosis measurement decreased with increasing severity of scoliosis. In Cobb L1-S1, centroid and posterior tangent L1-S1 methods, the ICCs were relatively lower in the high-grade scoliosis group (>or=0.60). And, the mean absolute difference (MAD) in these methods was high in the high-grade scoliosis group (<or=7.17 degrees ). However, in the Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-L5 method, the ICCs were >or=0.86 in all groups. And, in the TRALL method, the ICCs were >or=0.76 in all groups. In addition, in the Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-L5 method, the MAD was <or=3.63 degrees . And, in the TRALL method, the MAD was <or=3.84 degrees in all groups. We concluded that the Cobb L1-L5 and the posterior tangent L1-L5 methods are reliable methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis. And the TRALL method is more reliable method than other methods which include the L5-S1 joint in lordosis measurement.

摘要

有几种方法可用于测量腰椎前凸。在成人脊柱侧弯患者中,由于椎体终板的退行性改变以及冠状位和矢状位的畸形,测量较为困难。我们进行了一项由三名观察者参与的观察性研究,旨在确定六种方法测量成人脊柱侧弯患者整体腰椎前凸的可靠性。本研究共收集了 90 份侧位腰椎 X 线片。将 X 线片分为正常组(Cobb 角<10°)、低度组(Cobb 角 10°-19°)和高度组(Cobb 角≥20°),以确定 Cobb L1-S1、Cobb L1-L5、中心点、L1-S1 后切线、L1-L5 后切线和 TRALL 方法在成人脊柱侧弯中的可靠性。这 90 份侧位 X 线片由三名观察者分别使用六种方法进行两次测量。对数据进行分析,以确定组内和组间观察者的可靠性。总体而言,对于六种影像学方法,组内和组间的相关系数(ICC)均≥0.82。对不同程度脊柱侧弯组间的 ICC 值和 95%置信区间进行比较后发现,随着脊柱侧弯严重程度的增加,前凸测量的可靠性降低。在 Cobb L1-S1、中心点和 L1-S1 后切线方法中,高度组的 ICC 值相对较低(≥0.60)。此外,这些方法在高度组中的平均绝对差值(MAD)较高(<7.17°)。然而,在 Cobb L1-L5 和 L1-L5 后切线方法中,所有组的 ICC 值均≥0.86。并且,在 TRALL 方法中,所有组的 ICC 值均≥0.76。此外,在 Cobb L1-L5 和 L1-L5 后切线方法中,MAD 值<3.63°。并且,在 TRALL 方法中,所有组的 MAD 值均<3.84°。我们得出结论,Cobb L1-L5 和 L1-L5 后切线方法是测量成人脊柱侧弯患者整体腰椎前凸的可靠方法。并且,与其他包括 L5-S1 关节在内的前凸测量方法相比,TRALL 方法更可靠。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis.成人脊柱侧弯:一项定量影像学与临床分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Feb 15;27(4):387-92. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200202150-00012.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验