Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2010 May 5;30(18):6409-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5664-09.2010.
In monkeys, the somatosensory cortex on the parietal operculum can be differentiated into several distinct cortical fields. Potential human homologues for these areas have already been defined by cytoarchitectonic mapping and functional imaging experiments. Differences between the two most widely studied areas [operculum parietale (OP) 1 and OP 4] within this region particularly pertain to their connection with either the perceptive parietal network or the frontal motor areas. In the present study, we investigated differences in anatomical connection patterns probed by probabilistic tractography on diffusion tensor imaging data. Functional connectivity was then mapped by coordinate-based meta-analysis of imaging studies. Comparison between these two aspects of connectivity showed a good congruency and hence converging evidence for an involvement of these areas in matching brain networks. There were, however, also several instances in which anatomical and functional connectivity diverged, underlining the independence of these measures and the need for multimodal characterization of brain connectivity. The connectivity analyses performed showed that the two largest areas within the human parietal operculum region display considerable differences in their connectivity to frontoparietal brain regions. In particular, relative to OP 1, area OP 4 is more closely integrated with areas responsible for basic sensorimotor processing and action control, while OP 1 is more closely connected to the parietal networks for higher order somatosensory processing. These results are largely congruent with data on nonhuman primates. Differences between anatomical and functional connectivity as well as between species, however, highlight the need for an integrative view on connectivity, including comparison and cross-validation of results from different approaches.
在猴子中,顶叶前盖的躯体感觉皮层可以分为几个不同的皮层区域。通过细胞构筑图和功能成像实验,已经为这些区域的潜在人类同源物进行了定义。该区域内两个研究最广泛的区域(顶叶前盖 1 和 OP4)之间的差异特别涉及到它们与感知顶叶网络或额前运动区域的连接。在本研究中,我们通过扩散张量成像数据的概率轨迹追踪研究了解剖连接模式的差异。然后通过对成像研究的坐标基元荟萃分析来映射功能连接。这两个连接方面的比较显示出良好的一致性,因此为这些区域参与匹配脑网络提供了趋同的证据。然而,也有几个实例表明解剖和功能连接存在分歧,这强调了这些测量的独立性以及对脑连接进行多模态特征描述的必要性。进行的连接分析表明,人类顶叶前盖区域内的两个最大区域在与额顶叶脑区的连接方面存在相当大的差异。特别是相对于 OP1,区域 OP4 与负责基本感觉运动处理和动作控制的区域更为紧密地整合在一起,而 OP1 与更高阶躯体感觉处理的顶叶网络的连接更为紧密。这些结果与非人类灵长类动物的数据基本一致。然而,解剖和功能连接之间以及物种之间的差异突出表明需要对连接进行综合考虑,包括比较和交叉验证来自不同方法的结果。