• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙体修复和种植材料表面生物膜的形成。

Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, and University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):657-65. doi: 10.1177/0022034510368644. Epub 2010 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/0022034510368644
PMID:20448246
Abstract

Biomaterials for the restoration of oral function are prone to biofilm formation, affecting oral health. Oral bacteria adhere to hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, but due to fluctuating shear, little biofilm accumulates on hydrophobic surfaces in vivo. More biofilm accumulates on rough than on smooth surfaces. Oral biofilms mostly consist of multiple bacterial strains, but Candida species are found on acrylic dentures. Biofilms on gold and amalgam in vivo are thick and fully covering, but barely viable. Biofilms on ceramics are thin and highly viable. Biofilms on composites and glass-ionomer cements cause surface deterioration, which enhances biofilm formation again. Residual monomer release from composites influences biofilm growth in vitro, but effects in vivo are less pronounced, probably due to the large volume of saliva into which compounds are released and its continuous refreshment. Similarly, conflicting results have been reported on effects of fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements. Finally, biomaterial-associated infection of implants and devices elsewhere in the body is compared with oral biofilm formation. Biomaterial modifications to discourage biofilm formation on implants and devices are critically discussed for possible applications in dentistry. It is concluded that, for dental applications, antimicrobial coatings killing bacteria upon contact are more promising than antimicrobial-releasing coatings.

摘要

用于恢复口腔功能的生物材料容易形成生物膜,从而影响口腔健康。口腔细菌会附着在疏水性和亲水性表面上,但由于剪切力的波动,体内疏水性表面上几乎不会积累生物膜。粗糙表面上的生物膜比光滑表面上的生物膜积累得更多。口腔生物膜主要由多种细菌菌株组成,但在丙烯酸义齿上发现了假丝酵母属物种。体内的金和汞合金上的生物膜厚且完全覆盖,但几乎没有活性。陶瓷上的生物膜薄且高度活跃。复合材料和玻璃离子水泥上的生物膜会导致表面恶化,从而再次增强生物膜的形成。复合材料中残留单体的释放会影响体外生物膜的生长,但体内的影响不太明显,这可能是由于化合物释放到大量唾液中并不断更新。同样,玻璃离子水泥中氟化物释放的影响也有相互矛盾的报道。最后,将与身体其他部位的植入物和装置相关的生物材料相关性感染与口腔生物膜形成进行了比较。为了在牙科中可能应用,对阻止植入物和装置上生物膜形成的生物材料改性进行了批判性讨论。结论是,对于牙科应用,接触时杀死细菌的抗菌涂层比释放抗菌剂的涂层更有前景。

相似文献

1
Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials.牙体修复和种植材料表面生物膜的形成。
J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):657-65. doi: 10.1177/0022034510368644. Epub 2010 May 6.
2
Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development.材料特性和/或表面形貌对生物膜形成的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x.
3
Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.牙种植体上的生物膜:文献综述
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):616-26.
4
Effects of Material Properties on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation.材料特性对细菌黏附和生物膜形成的影响。
J Dent Res. 2015 Aug;94(8):1027-34. doi: 10.1177/0022034515587690. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
[The influence of cell surface hydrophobicity Candida sp. on biofilm formation on different biomaterials].[念珠菌属细胞表面疏水性对不同生物材料上生物膜形成的影响]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2009;61(3):267-71.
6
Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials--an in vitro study.表面自由能与细菌在唾液包被的牙科植入材料上的黏附——一项体外研究。
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004 Dec 25;39(4):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.08.002.
7
Effects of biomaterial surface chemistry on the adhesion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro.生物材料表面化学对表皮葡萄球菌体外黏附及生物膜形成的影响
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Sep 15;78(4):836-42. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30905.
8
S. epidermidis biofilm formation: effects of biomaterial surface chemistry and serum proteins.表皮葡萄球菌生物膜形成:生物材料表面化学和血清蛋白的影响
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 1;80(3):742-51. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31103.
9
In vitro and in vivo comparisons of staphylococcal biofilm formation on a cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol)-based polymer coating.交联聚乙二醇基聚合物涂层上葡萄球菌生物膜形成的体外和体内比较。
Acta Biomater. 2010 Mar;6(3):1119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.040. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
10
In vitro study of biofilm formation and effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment on various dental material surfaces.体外研究生物膜形成以及各种牙科材料表面抗菌治疗的效果。
Mol Oral Microbiol. 2010 Dec;25(6):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00586.x.

引用本文的文献

1
From Salivary Dysfunction to Prosthetic Challenges in Xerostomia and Denture Retention with Oral Gels.从唾液功能障碍到口干症及义齿固位方面使用口腔凝胶的修复挑战
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;18(13):3141. doi: 10.3390/ma18133141.
2
Influence of Filler Content and Polishing on and Biofilm Formation in Resin-Based Composites: An In Vitro Evaluation.填料含量和抛光对树脂基复合材料中细菌生物膜形成的影响:一项体外评估
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2025 Jun 22;2025:5734405. doi: 10.1155/cjid/5734405. eCollection 2025.
3
Do 3D-Printed and Milled Denture Bases Differ in Microbial Activity and Adhesion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
3D打印和铣削义齿基托在微生物活性和黏附方面存在差异吗?一项系统评价和Meta分析。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 19;75(4):100857. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100857.
4
Progress in visible-light-activated photocatalytic coatings to combat implant-related infections: From mechanistic to translational roadmap.用于对抗植入物相关感染的可见光激活光催化涂层的进展:从作用机制到转化路线图。
Bioact Mater. 2025 May 11;51:83-137. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.04.037. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Effect of titanium dioxide nanotubes incorporated into conventional glass ionomer cement on L. acidophilus.掺入传统玻璃离子水门汀中的二氧化钛纳米管对嗜酸乳杆菌的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Jun 2;39:e059. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.059. eCollection 2025.
6
Surface energetics of antibiofilm property of dental material added with green synthesized copper nanoparticles.添加绿色合成铜纳米粒子的牙科材料抗生物膜性能的表面能学
AMB Express. 2025 May 6;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13568-024-01820-2.
7
Predictors and development patterns of approximal caries: a retrospective cross-sectional radiographic assessment.邻面龋的预测因素及发展模式:一项回顾性横断面影像学评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05844-3.
8
Influence of acidic solutions on surface roughness of polished and glazed CAD-CAM restorative materials.酸性溶液对抛光和上釉的CAD-CAM修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。
Head Face Med. 2025 Mar 1;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00486-w.
9
model of bacterial biofilm mineralization in complex humid environments: a proof of concept study.复杂潮湿环境中细菌生物膜矿化模型:一项概念验证研究
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 10;12:1496117. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1496117. eCollection 2024.
10
Determination of streptococcus mutans retention in acidic and neutral pH artificial saliva environment of all-ceramic materials with different surface treatment.不同表面处理的全瓷材料在酸性和中性pH值人工唾液环境中变形链球菌黏附情况的测定
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05386-0.