• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患儿及团队相关因素对儿科重症监护转运中稳定时间的影响。

Effect of patient- and team-related factors on stabilization time during pediatric intensive care transport.

机构信息

Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS), London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;11(4):451-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e30ce7.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e30ce7
PMID:20453701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of patient- and transport-related factors on the time spent at the referring hospital by an intensive care retrieval team to stabilize critically ill children and to study the relationship between stabilization time and patient outcome.

DESIGN

: Analysis of prospectively collected data during pediatric intensive care transport.

SETTING

A dedicated regional pediatric intensive care retrieval service performing interhospital transports in England.

PATIENTS

Critically ill children transported to intensive care units over a 2-yr period between April 1, 2006 and March 31, 2008.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Factors related to the patient (age group, diagnostic category, and severity of illness) and transport (time of referral, team response time, and number of major and minor interventions performed) were analyzed for their effect on stabilization time in univariate and multivariate analyses. The relationship between stabilization time and patient outcome in the first 24 hrs post intensive care unit admission was also studied. Patient acuity was high in the transported population (84% invasively ventilated; 28% on vasoactive agents). Predicted mortality risk (Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score), diagnostic category, team response time, and number of major interventions performed had an independent effect on stabilization time, whereas the length of stabilization itself did not influence early mortality on the intensive care unit. Each minor intervention prolonged the stabilization time by an average of 10 mins.

CONCLUSIONS

Stabilization time during intensive care transport is influenced by a number of patient- and transport-related factors, and cannot be used in isolation as an indicator of team efficiency. Time spent undertaking intensive care interventions early in the course of patient illness at the referring hospital does not worsen patient outcome, suggesting that the "scoop and run" model can be safely abandoned in interhospital transport.

摘要

目的

研究患者和转运相关因素对重症儿童急救转运团队在转诊医院停留时间的影响,并研究稳定化时间与患者预后之间的关系。

设计

对儿科重症监护转运期间前瞻性收集的数据进行分析。

地点

在英格兰,一家专门的区域性儿科重症监护转运服务机构,负责进行医院间转运。

患者

2006 年 4 月 1 日至 2008 年 3 月 31 日期间,2 年内转运至重症监护病房的危重病儿。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在单变量和多变量分析中,分析了与患者(年龄组、诊断类别和疾病严重程度)和转运(转诊时间、团队响应时间以及进行的主要和次要干预的次数)相关的因素对稳定化时间的影响。还研究了稳定化时间与重症监护病房入院后 24 小时内患者预后之间的关系。转运人群的患者病情严重(84%有创通气;28%使用血管活性药物)。预测死亡率风险(儿科死亡率 2 评分)、诊断类别、团队响应时间和主要干预次数对稳定化时间有独立影响,而稳定化本身的时间长短并不影响重症监护病房的早期死亡率。每次次要干预平均延长稳定化时间 10 分钟。

结论

重症监护转运过程中的稳定化时间受多种患者和转运相关因素的影响,不能孤立地作为团队效率的指标。在转诊医院对患者疾病早期进行重症监护干预所花费的时间不会使患者预后恶化,这表明在医院间转运中可以安全地放弃“ scooping and run”模式。

相似文献

1
Effect of patient- and team-related factors on stabilization time during pediatric intensive care transport.患儿及团队相关因素对儿科重症监护转运中稳定时间的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul;11(4):451-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181e30ce7.
2
Pretransport Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score underestimates the requirement for intensive care or major interventions during interhospital transport.院间转运期间,院前小儿死亡风险(PRISM)评分低估了重症监护或重大干预措施的需求。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jan;22(1):101-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199401000-00020.
3
Stabilisation of critically ill children at the district general hospital prior to intensive care retrieval: a snapshot of current practice.在重症监护病房取回前稳定地区综合医院的危重症儿童:当前实践的快照。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Sep;95(9):681-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.151266. Epub 2009 Aug 9.
4
Interhospital Transport of Critically Ill Children to PICUs in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: Analysis of an International Dataset.英国和爱尔兰共和国儿科重症监护病房之间危重症儿童的医院间转运:国际数据集分析。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;19(6):e300-e311. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001506.
5
Reduction of morbidity in interhospital transport by specialized pediatric staff.由专业儿科工作人员降低院际转运中的发病率。
Crit Care Med. 1994 Jul;22(7):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199407000-00023.
6
Point-of-care blood analyzer during the interhospital transport of critically ill children.危重症儿童院际转运期间的床旁血液分析仪
Eur J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(5):304-7. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200610000-00013.
7
Impact of Retrieval, Distance Traveled, and Referral Center on Outcomes in Unplanned Admissions to a National PICU.检索、转运距离及转诊中心对全国性儿科重症监护病房非计划入院结局的影响
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):e34-42. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000586.
8
Intrahospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients.危重症儿科患者的院内转运
Crit Care Med. 1995 Sep;23(9):1588-95. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199509000-00020.
9
Comparison of interhospital pediatric intensive care transport accompanied by a referring specialist or a specialist retrieval team.由转诊专科医生或专科急救团队陪同的院际儿科重症监护转运的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Feb;30(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2066-7. Epub 2003 Nov 15.
10
Transport for paediatric intensive care. Measuring the performance of a specialist transport service.儿科重症监护转运。评估专业转运服务的绩效。
Paediatr Anaesth. 1995;5(5):287-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.1995.tb00306.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency critical care: closing the gap between onset of critical illness and intensive care unit admission.急诊重症监护:弥合危重病发作与重症监护病房收治之间的差距。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Dec;136(23-24):651-661. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02374-w. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
The effect of care provided by paediatric critical care transport teams on mortality of children transported to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: a retrospective cohort study.儿科危重症转运团队提供的护理对英格兰和威尔士转运至儿科重症监护病房儿童死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 May 3;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02689-x.
3
Paediatric health care access in community health centres is associated with survival for critically ill children who undergo inter-facility transport: A province-wide observational study.
社区卫生中心的儿科医疗服务可及性与接受机构间转运的危重症患儿的生存情况相关:一项全省范围的观察性研究。
Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Aug;25(5):308-316. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz013. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Does time taken by paediatric critical care transport teams to reach the bedside of critically ill children affect survival? A retrospective cohort study from England and Wales.儿科重症监护转运团队到达病危儿童床边所需的时间是否会影响生存率?来自英格兰和威尔士的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 19;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02195-6.
5
Evaluation of specific quality metrics to assess the performance of a specialised newborn transport programme.评估特定质量指标以评估专门新生儿转运计划的性能。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;179(6):919-928. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03573-z. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet?转运重症患者:我们到了吗?
Crit Care. 2015 Feb 20;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0749-4.
7
Investigation of the status of interhospital transport of critically ill pediatric patients.危重新生儿院际转运现状调查。
World J Pediatr. 2015 Feb;11(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s12519-015-0004-8. Epub 2015 Jan 28.