• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据退伍军人右心室起搏频率的长期死亡率结果。

Long-term mortality outcomes according to the frequency of right ventricular pacing in veterans.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Res Pract. 2010;2010:310768. doi: 10.4061/2010/310768. Epub 2010 May 5.

DOI:10.4061/2010/310768
PMID:20454580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2864481/
Abstract

Background. Right ventricular pacing (RVP) has been associated with adverse outcomes, including heart failure and death. Minimizing RVP has been proposed as a therapeutic goal for a variety of pacing devices and indications. Objective. Quantify survival according to frequency of RVP in veterans with pacemakers. Methods. We analyzed electrograms from transtelephonic monitoring of veterans implanted with pacemakers between 1995 and 2005 followed by the Eastern Pacemaker Surveillance Center. We compared all cause mortality and time to death between patients with less than 20% and more than 80% RVP. Results. Analysis was limited to the 7198 patients with at least six trans-telephonic monitoring records (mean = 21). Average follow-up was 5.3 years. Average age at pacemaker implant was significantly lower among veterans with <20% RVP (67 years versus 72 years; P < .0001). An equal proportion of deaths during follow-up were noted for each group: 126/565 patients (22%) with <20% RVP and 1113/4968 patients (22%) with >80% RVP. However, average post-implant survival was 4.3 years with <20% RVP versus 4.7 years with >80% RVP (P < .0001). Conclusions. Greater frequency (>80%) of RVP was not associated with higher mortality in this population of veterans. Those veterans utilizing <20% RVP had a shortened adjusted survival rate (P = .0016).

摘要

背景

右心室起搏(RVP)与心力衰竭和死亡等不良结局相关。为了各种起搏设备和适应证,已经提出将最小化 RVP 作为治疗目标。目的:根据起搏器患者 RVP 的频率来量化生存率。方法:我们分析了 1995 年至 2005 年间接受起搏器植入的退伍军人的远程监测心电图,并由东部起搏器监测中心进行随访。我们比较了 RVP 小于 20%和大于 80%的患者的全因死亡率和死亡时间。结果:分析仅限于至少有 6 份远程监测记录的 7198 名患者(平均=21 份)。平均随访时间为 5.3 年。RVP 小于 20%的退伍军人的起搏器植入时年龄明显较低(67 岁对 72 岁;P <.0001)。随访期间每组的死亡比例相等:RVP 小于 20%的 565 名患者中有 126 名(22%),RVP 大于 80%的 4968 名患者中有 1113 名(22%)。然而,RVP 小于 20%的患者平均术后生存时间为 4.3 年,RVP 大于 80%的患者为 4.7 年(P <.0001)。结论:在这群退伍军人中,RVP 频率较高(>80%)与死亡率升高无关。那些 RVP 小于 20%的退伍军人的调整后生存率缩短(P=.0016)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/01e3d7f4a737/CRP2010-310768.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/0293161a04ef/CRP2010-310768.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/0eb3a2e7a752/CRP2010-310768.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/75aba742fad4/CRP2010-310768.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/c6a2e58650a7/CRP2010-310768.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/01e3d7f4a737/CRP2010-310768.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/0293161a04ef/CRP2010-310768.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/0eb3a2e7a752/CRP2010-310768.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/75aba742fad4/CRP2010-310768.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/c6a2e58650a7/CRP2010-310768.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae8b/2864481/01e3d7f4a737/CRP2010-310768.005.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term mortality outcomes according to the frequency of right ventricular pacing in veterans.根据退伍军人右心室起搏频率的长期死亡率结果。
Cardiol Res Pract. 2010;2010:310768. doi: 10.4061/2010/310768. Epub 2010 May 5.
2
Impact of physiologic pacing versus right ventricular pacing among patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35%: A systematic review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.左心室射血分数大于 35%的患者中生理性起搏与右心室起搏的影响:2018 年 ACC/AHA/HRS 心动过缓和心脏传导阻滞患者评估和管理指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):e280-e298. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.035. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
3
Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.左心室射血分数大于 35%的患者中心律生理性起搏与右心室起搏的影响:2018 年 ACC/AHA/HRS 指南关于心动过缓和心脏传导阻滞患者评估与管理的科学综述:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20;74(7):988-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.045. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
4
Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing.希氏束起搏与右心室起搏的临床转归比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
5
Impact of Physiologic Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing Among Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Greater Than 35%: A Systematic Review for the 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.左心室射血分数大于 35%的患者中生理性起搏与右心室起搏的影响:2018ACC/AHA/HRS 心动过缓和心脏传导阻滞患者评估和管理指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告。
Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e483-e503. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000629. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Permanent His-bundle pacing: Long-term lead performance and clinical outcomes.永久性希氏束起搏:长期导线性能和临床结局。
Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):696-702. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.022. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Risk of heart failure- and cardiac death gradually increases with more right ventricular pacing.随着右心室起搏次数增多,心力衰竭和心源性死亡的风险会逐渐增加。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;185:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.053. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice.在常规临床实践中,永久性希氏束起搏是可行、安全的,且优于右心室起搏。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Right ventricular pacing is associated with impaired overall survival, but not with an increased incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in routine cardioverter/defibrillator recipients with reservedly programmed pacing.右心室起搏与总体生存率受损相关,但在起搏程控保守的常规心脏复律/除颤器植入者中,与室性快速性心律失常的发生率增加无关。
Europace. 2009 Jul;11(7):924-30. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup118. Epub 2009 May 15.
10
Echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with and without previous right ventricular pacing.心力衰竭患者中有无先前右心室起搏的心脏再同步治疗的超声心动图和临床反应。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;16(11):1199-205. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.143. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Atrial vs. dual-chamber cardiac pacing in sinus node disease: a register-based cohort study.窦房结疾病中房性起搏与双腔心脏起搏的比较:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Europace. 2008 Jul;10(7):825-31. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun118. Epub 2008 May 7.
2
Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.在患有窦房结疾病和房室传导阻滞的患者中,采用心室管理起搏模式减少不必要的右心室起搏。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Jul;29(7):697-705. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00422.x.
3
Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial.
右心室起搏百分比可预测DAVID试验的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2005 Aug;2(8):830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.05.015.
4
Minimizing right ventricular pacing.尽量减少右心室起搏。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 15;95(8):966-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.036.
5
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure.晚期慢性心力衰竭患者接受或不接受植入式除颤器的心脏再同步治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.
6
Left ventricular mechanics during right ventricular apical or left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation.房室结消融术后慢性心房颤动患者右心室心尖部起搏或左心室起搏时的左心室力学
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Mar 17;43(6):1013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.038.
7
Adverse effects of ventricular desynchronization induced by long-term right ventricular pacing.长期右心室起搏所致心室失同步的不良反应。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20;42(4):624-6. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00769-1.
8
Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.在一项针对窦房结功能障碍的起搏器治疗临床试验中,心室起搏对基线QRS时限正常患者的心力衰竭和心房颤动的不良影响。
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2.
9
Pathophysiology of physiologic cardiac pacing: advantages of leaving well enough alone.生理性心脏起搏的病理生理学:顺其自然的优势。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3159-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3159.
10
Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction.用于窦房结功能障碍的心室起搏或双腔起搏。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1854-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013040.