• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

总结性评价对医学生学习的影响机制。

The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students' learning.

机构信息

Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):695-715. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9232-9. Epub 2010 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10459-010-9232-9
PMID:20455078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2995206/
Abstract

It has become axiomatic that assessment impacts powerfully on student learning, but there is a surprising dearth of research on how. This study explored the mechanism of impact of summative assessment on the process of learning of theory in higher education. Individual, in-depth interviews were conducted with medical students and analyzed qualitatively. The impact of assessment on learning was mediated through various determinants of action. Respondents' learning behaviour was influenced by: appraising the impact of assessment; appraising their learning response; their perceptions of agency; and contextual factors. This study adds to scant extant evidence and proposes a mechanism to explain this impact. It should help enhance the use of assessment as a tool to augment learning.

摘要

评估对学生的学习有很大的影响,这已经是不言而喻的事实,但关于具体影响方式的研究却少之又少。本研究探讨了总结性评估对高等教育理论学习过程的影响机制。通过对医学生进行个体深入访谈,并进行定性分析。评估对学习的影响是通过各种行动决定因素来实现的。被调查者的学习行为受到以下因素的影响:评估评估的影响;评估他们的学习反应;他们对能动性的看法;以及背景因素。本研究增加了很少的现有证据,并提出了一种解释这种影响的机制。它应该有助于提高评估作为增强学习的工具的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f309/2995206/4915431b68fc/10459_2010_9232_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f309/2995206/4915431b68fc/10459_2010_9232_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f309/2995206/4915431b68fc/10459_2010_9232_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students' learning.总结性评价对医学生学习的影响机制。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Dec;15(5):695-715. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9232-9. Epub 2010 May 9.
2
A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education.医学教育总结性评估的预评估学习效果模型。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):39-53. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9292-5. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
3
Students' perception of the learning environment in a distributed medical programme.学生对分布式医学项目学习环境的感知。
Med Educ Online. 2010 Sep 24;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5168.
4
[The impact of a self-directed teaching approach on academic performance of medical students].[自主教学法对医学生学业成绩的影响]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 May;145(5):595-602. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872017000500006.
5
Assessment to Optimize Learning Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions.学习策略优化评估:学生和教师感知的定性研究。
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Jun-Jul;33(3):245-257. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1852940. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
Adult learning theories: implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 83.成人学习理论:对医学教育学习和教学的启示:AMEE 指南第 83 号。
Med Teach. 2013 Nov;35(11):e1561-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.828153. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
7
Integrated method of teaching in Web Quest activity and its impact on undergraduate students' cognition and learning behaviors: a future trend in medical education.网络探究活动中的综合教学方法及其对本科生认知和学习行为的影响:医学教育的未来趋势。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jan 14;7(4):249-59. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n4p249.
8
[Can medical students' motivation for a course of basic physiology education integrating into lectures some active learning methods be improved?].[将一些主动学习方法融入讲座的基础生理学教育课程能否提高医学生的学习动机?]
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Dec 26;28:315. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.315.10251. eCollection 2017.
9
Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature.动机理论是否指导了医学教育课程的发展和改革?文献回顾。
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):735-43. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318253cc0e.
10
How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59.自我决定理论如何帮助我们理解医学教育中的教与学过程。AMEE 指南第 59 号。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961-73. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical students' perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study.迪拜医学生对评估的认知及其对学习的影响:一项聚合性混合方法研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 4;12:1620437. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1620437. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors influencing clinician-educators' assessment practice in varied Southern contexts: a health behaviour theory perspective.影响不同南方背景下临床教育工作者评估实践的因素:健康行为理论视角
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Feb;30(1):195-222. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10341-3. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
"They were very very nice but just not very good": The interplay between resident-supervisor relationships and assessment in the emergency setting.

本文引用的文献

1
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
2
Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review.医学教育中的档案袋:为何它们的成效参差不齐?一项系统综述。
Med Educ. 2007 Dec;41(12):1224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02944.x.
3
Volunteer bias in medical education research: an empirical study of over three decades of longitudinal data.
“他们非常非常友善,但就是不太出色”:急诊环境中住院医师与上级医师关系和评估之间的相互作用
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 25;8(2):e10976. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10976. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Exploring residents' perceptions of competency-based medical education across Canada: A national survey study.探索加拿大各地住院医师对基于胜任力的医学教育的看法:一项全国性调查研究。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Jan 8;14:2. doi: 10.12688/mep.19247.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Does performance on United States national board of medical examiners reflect student clinical experiences in United Arab Emirates?美国医学考试委员会的考试成绩能否反映阿联酋学生的临床经验?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Apr 1;8:4. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000004.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Factors affecting residents' internal motivation, grit, and well-being.影响住院医师内在动机、坚毅和幸福感的因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04679-2.
7
If we assess, will they learn? Students' perspectives on the complexities of assessment-for-learning.如果我们评估,他们会学习吗?学生对评估促进学习的复杂性的看法。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Sep 8;14(4):94-104. doi: 10.36834/cmej.73875. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
A successful intervention to improve conceptual knowledge of medical students who rely on memorization of disclosed items.一项成功的干预措施,用于提高依赖记忆已公开项目的医学生的概念知识。
Front Physiol. 2023 Aug 30;14:1258149. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1258149. eCollection 2023.
9
Test-enhanced learning: As easy as (A), (B), (C).测试强化学习:如(A)、(B)、(C)般简单。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Apr 1;7(2):e10825. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10825. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Clinician educators' conceptions of assessment in medical education.临床教师对医学教育评估的概念。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2023 Oct;28(4):1053-1077. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10197-5. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
医学教育研究中的志愿者偏差:对三十多年纵向数据的实证研究
Med Educ. 2007 Aug;41(8):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02803.x.
4
The qualitative research interview.定性研究访谈
Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
5
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
6
Integrating social-psychological frameworks for health behavior research.整合用于健康行为研究的社会心理框架。
Am J Health Behav. 2001 Nov-Dec;25(6):528-36. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.25.6.2.
7
Motivation in action: towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation.行动中的动机:迈向以过程为导向的学生动机概念化
Br J Educ Psychol. 2000 Dec;70 Pt 4:519-38. doi: 10.1348/000709900158281.
8
The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students.评估与考试对医学生学习的影响。
Med Educ. 1983 May;17(3):165-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb00657.x.
9
On qualitative differences in learning: IV -- effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome.论学习中的质性差异:IV——内在动机和外在考试焦虑对过程及结果的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 1977 Nov;47(3):244-57. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1977.tb02353.x.