全科医生希望从精神科医生的信件中得到什么？
What do GPs want from a psychiatrist's letter?
作者信息
Selzer Rob, Foley Fiona, Ellen Steve, McGartland Michael
机构信息
School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
出版信息
Australas Psychiatry. 2009;17(5):385-8. doi: 10.1080/10398560902971771.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate the preferences of general practitioners (GPs) in reply letters for patients referred for a one-off psychiatric assessment.
METHOD
A sample of GPs referring to a primary mental health team service were mailed a questionnaire inquiring into the usefulness of 21 different letter items.
RESULTS
The response rate was 51%. Many of the items in our routine reply letters were rated highly, but others such as developmental history, supplementary information and a comprehensive report were not. Sending a copy of the letter to the patient was rated as useful by only 42.5%.
CONCLUSIONS
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' guidelines for reply letters are endorsed. There are, however, some additional items that GPs may find useful.
目的
本研究旨在调查全科医生（GPs）在为转介进行一次性精神科评估的患者撰写回信时的偏好。
方法
向转介至初级心理健康团队服务的全科医生样本邮寄了一份问卷，询问21个不同信件项目的有用性。
结果
回复率为51%。我们常规回信中的许多项目评分很高，但诸如发育史、补充信息和综合报告等其他项目则不然。仅42.5%的人认为向患者发送信件副本有用。
结论
澳大利亚和新西兰皇家精神科医学院关于回信的指南得到认可。然而，全科医生可能会发现一些其他项目也有用。
Zotero 插件