Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockhom, Sweden.
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):708-14. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181de467a.
To investigate the validity and reproducibility of a newly developed internet-based self-administered hearing test using clinical pure-tone air-conducted audiometry as gold standard.
Cross-sectional intrasubject comparative study.
Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Seventy-two participants (79% women) with mean age of 45 years (range, 19-71 yr). Twenty participants had impaired hearing according to the gold standard test.
Hearing tests.
The Pearson correlation coefficient between the results of the studied Internet-based hearing test and the gold standard test, the greatest mean differences in decibel between the 2 tests over tested frequencies, sensitivity and specificity to diagnose hearing loss defined by Heibel-Lidén, and test-retest reproducibility with the Pearson correlation coefficient.
The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.94 (p < 0.0001) for the right ear and 0.93 for the left (p = 0.0001). The greatest mean differences were seen for the frequencies 2 and 4 kHz, with -5.6 dB (standard deviation, 8.29), and -5.1 dB (standard deviation, 6.9), respectively. The 75th percentiles of intraindividual test-gold standard differences did not exceed -10 dB for any of the frequencies. The sensitivity for hearing loss was 75% (95% confidence interval, 51%-90%), and the specificity was 96% (95% confidence interval, 86%-99%). The test-retest reproducibility was excellent, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) for both ears.
It is possible to assess hearing with reasonable accuracy using an Internet-based hearing test on a personal computer with headphones. The practical viability of self-administration in participants' homes needs further evaluation.
以临床纯音气导测听为金标准,研究一种新开发的基于互联网的自我管理听力测试的有效性和可重复性。
横截面个体内比较研究。
瑞典卡罗林斯卡大学医院,索尔纳。
72 名参与者(79%为女性),平均年龄 45 岁(范围,19-71 岁)。20 名参与者根据金标准测试结果听力受损。
听力测试。
研究中基于互联网的听力测试结果与金标准测试结果之间的 Pearson 相关系数、2 种测试在测试频率上的最大平均差异、诊断 Heibel-Lidén 定义的听力损失的敏感性和特异性,以及 Pearson 相关系数的测试重测可重复性。
右耳的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.94(p<0.0001),左耳为 0.93(p=0.0001)。最大平均差异见于 2 kHz 和 4 kHz 频率,分别为-5.6 dB(标准差 8.29)和-5.1 dB(标准差 6.9)。对于任何频率,个体内测试-金标准差异的第 75 百分位数均不超过-10 dB。听力损失的敏感性为 75%(95%置信区间,51%-90%),特异性为 96%(95%置信区间,86%-99%)。测试重测的可重复性极好,双耳的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.99(p<0.0001)。
使用带耳机的个人计算机进行基于互联网的听力测试,可以合理准确地评估听力。需要进一步评估参与者在家中自我管理的实际可行性。