• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于互联网的非临床环境简易听力测试:初步验证和原理证明。

An internet-based hearing test for simple audiometry in nonclinical settings: preliminary validation and proof of principle.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockhom, Sweden.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):708-14. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181de467a.

DOI:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181de467a
PMID:20458255
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the validity and reproducibility of a newly developed internet-based self-administered hearing test using clinical pure-tone air-conducted audiometry as gold standard.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional intrasubject comparative study.

SETTING

Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two participants (79% women) with mean age of 45 years (range, 19-71 yr). Twenty participants had impaired hearing according to the gold standard test.

INTERVENTIONS

Hearing tests.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Pearson correlation coefficient between the results of the studied Internet-based hearing test and the gold standard test, the greatest mean differences in decibel between the 2 tests over tested frequencies, sensitivity and specificity to diagnose hearing loss defined by Heibel-Lidén, and test-retest reproducibility with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.94 (p < 0.0001) for the right ear and 0.93 for the left (p = 0.0001). The greatest mean differences were seen for the frequencies 2 and 4 kHz, with -5.6 dB (standard deviation, 8.29), and -5.1 dB (standard deviation, 6.9), respectively. The 75th percentiles of intraindividual test-gold standard differences did not exceed -10 dB for any of the frequencies. The sensitivity for hearing loss was 75% (95% confidence interval, 51%-90%), and the specificity was 96% (95% confidence interval, 86%-99%). The test-retest reproducibility was excellent, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) for both ears.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to assess hearing with reasonable accuracy using an Internet-based hearing test on a personal computer with headphones. The practical viability of self-administration in participants' homes needs further evaluation.

摘要

目的

以临床纯音气导测听为金标准,研究一种新开发的基于互联网的自我管理听力测试的有效性和可重复性。

研究设计

横截面个体内比较研究。

设置

瑞典卡罗林斯卡大学医院,索尔纳。

患者

72 名参与者(79%为女性),平均年龄 45 岁(范围,19-71 岁)。20 名参与者根据金标准测试结果听力受损。

干预

听力测试。

主要观察指标

研究中基于互联网的听力测试结果与金标准测试结果之间的 Pearson 相关系数、2 种测试在测试频率上的最大平均差异、诊断 Heibel-Lidén 定义的听力损失的敏感性和特异性,以及 Pearson 相关系数的测试重测可重复性。

结果

右耳的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.94(p<0.0001),左耳为 0.93(p=0.0001)。最大平均差异见于 2 kHz 和 4 kHz 频率,分别为-5.6 dB(标准差 8.29)和-5.1 dB(标准差 6.9)。对于任何频率,个体内测试-金标准差异的第 75 百分位数均不超过-10 dB。听力损失的敏感性为 75%(95%置信区间,51%-90%),特异性为 96%(95%置信区间,86%-99%)。测试重测的可重复性极好,双耳的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.99(p<0.0001)。

结论

使用带耳机的个人计算机进行基于互联网的听力测试,可以合理准确地评估听力。需要进一步评估参与者在家中自我管理的实际可行性。

相似文献

1
An internet-based hearing test for simple audiometry in nonclinical settings: preliminary validation and proof of principle.基于互联网的非临床环境简易听力测试:初步验证和原理证明。
Otol Neurotol. 2010 Jul;31(5):708-14. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181de467a.
2
Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.耳蜗听力障碍的评估:正常畸变产物耳声发射测量
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):778-92. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576755.
3
Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.一组纯音听力阈值正常的职业歌手的瞬态诱发耳声发射。
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):360-77. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d1e.
4
Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.仅使用空气传导测试来识别传导性听力损失:自动测试组合的可靠性和有效性。
Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829e058f.
5
[Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].[内耳听力损失对瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)的影响]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Dec;75(12):709-18. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997664.
6
High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.儿童高频纯音测听:与耳毒性标准相关的测试-重测信度研究。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):104-11. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228a77d.
7
Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.畸变产物耳声发射的重测重复性
Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):378-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816906e7.
8
Evaluation of an internet-based hearing test--comparison with established methods for detection of hearing loss.基于互联网的听力测试评估——与检测听力损失的既定方法的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Oct 21;10(4):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1065.
9
Audiological findings among workers from Brazilian small-scale fisheries.巴西小规模渔业工人的听力学研究结果。
Ear Hear. 2009 Feb;30(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818fba17.
10
Clinical evaluation of a computerized self-administered hearing test.计算机化自测试听力的临床评估。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Aug;51(8):606-10. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.688144. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of virtual reality pure-tone audiometry in training of hearing test for audiologist.虚拟现实纯音听力测试在听力学家听力测试培训中的效果。
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 28;10(24):e40795. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40795. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
2
The Hearing Test App for Android Devices: Distinctive Features of Pure-Tone Audiometry Performed on Mobile Devices.适用于安卓设备的听力测试应用程序:在移动设备上进行纯音听力测试的独特功能。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Apr 20;17:151-163. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S454359. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring Hearing Care Technology from Clinic to Capability.
探索从诊所到实际应用的听力护理技术。
Semin Hear. 2023 Jun 5;44(3):287-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769741. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Utilizing True Wireless Stereo Earbuds in Automated Pure-Tone Audiometry.在自动纯音测听中使用真无线立体声耳机。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211057367. doi: 10.1177/23312165211057367.
5
A Smartphone-Based Approach to Screening for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Cross-Sectional Validity Study.基于智能手机的突发性聋筛查方法:横断面有效性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 11;8(11):e23047. doi: 10.2196/23047.
6
Personal Music Players Use and Other Noise Hazards among Children 11 to 12 Years Old.儿童 11 至 12 岁使用个人音乐播放器及其他噪声危害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;17(18):6934. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186934.
7
Results of hearing screening of school-age children in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.吉尔吉斯斯坦比什凯克学龄儿童听力筛查结果。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Jun 10;21:e18. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000183.
8
Sensitivity and Specificity of Automated Audiometry in Subjects with Normal Hearing or Hearing Impairment.正常听力或听力受损受试者自动听力测定的敏感性和特异性
Noise Health. 2019 Jan-Feb;21(98):1-6. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.278701.
9
A Mobile Phone-Based Approach for Hearing Screening of School-Age Children: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.基于手机的学龄儿童听力筛查方法:横断面验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 1;7(4):e12033. doi: 10.2196/12033.
10
Hearing Tests Based on Biologically Calibrated Mobile Devices: Comparison With Pure-Tone Audiometry.基于生物校准移动设备的听力测试:与纯音听力测定法的比较
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 10;6(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7800.