Yu Amy Marie, McVey Mitch
Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2010 Sep;38(17):5706-17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq379. Epub 2010 May 11.
Ku or DNA ligase 4-independent alternative end joining (alt-EJ) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) frequently correlates with increased junctional microhomology. However, alt-EJ also produces junctions without microhomology (apparent blunt joins), and the exact role of microhomology in both alt-EJ and classical non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) remains unclear. To better understand the degree to which alt-EJ depends on annealing at pre-existing microhomologies, we examined inaccurate repair of an I-SceI DSB lacking nearby microhomologies of greater than four nucleotides in Drosophila. Lig4 deficiency affected neither frequency nor length of junctional microhomology, but significantly increased insertion frequency. Many insertions appeared to be templated. Based on sequence analysis of repair junctions, we propose a model of synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining (SD-MMEJ), in which de novo synthesis by an accurate non-processive DNA polymerase creates microhomology. Repair junctions with apparent blunt joins, junctional microhomologies and short indels (deletion with insertion) are often considered to reflect different repair mechanisms. However, a majority of each type had structures consistent with the predictions of our SD-MMEJ model. This suggests that a single underlying mechanism could be responsible for all three repair product types. Genetic analysis indicates that SD-MMEJ is Ku70, Lig4 and Rad51-independent but impaired in mus308 (POLQ) mutants.
Ku或DNA连接酶4非依赖性的DNA双链断裂(DSB)替代末端连接(alt-EJ)修复常常与连接点微同源性增加相关。然而,alt-EJ也会产生没有微同源性的连接点(明显的平端连接),并且微同源性在alt-EJ和经典非同源末端连接(NHEJ)中的具体作用仍不清楚。为了更好地理解alt-EJ在多大程度上依赖于在预先存在的微同源序列处的退火,我们研究了果蝇中缺乏附近大于四个核苷酸的微同源序列的I-SceI DSB的不准确修复。Lig4缺陷既不影响连接点微同源性的频率也不影响其长度,但显著增加了插入频率。许多插入似乎是有模板的。基于修复连接点的序列分析,我们提出了一种合成依赖性微同源性介导的末端连接(SD-MMEJ)模型,其中由精确的非连续DNA聚合酶进行的从头合成产生微同源性。具有明显平端连接、连接点微同源性和短插入缺失(缺失与插入)的修复连接点通常被认为反映了不同的修复机制。然而,每种类型中的大多数都具有与我们的SD-MMEJ模型预测一致的结构。这表明单一的潜在机制可能负责所有三种修复产物类型。遗传分析表明,SD-MMEJ不依赖于Ku70、Lig4和Rad51,但在mus308(POLQ)突变体中受损。