Rangeland Ecology and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2126, USA.
Ecology. 2010 Apr;91(4):1152-62. doi: 10.1890/08-1105.1.
Investigations of structure in ecological communities need to move beyond the dichotomy between niche and neutral theory to broader conceptual frameworks that accommodate both neutral stochastic and biological structuring processes in organizing species assemblages. We propose and test a framework that integrates niche and neutral-assembly perspectives and determines their relative contributions in structuring diverse shrub species assemblages in a parkland savanna. Our approach proposes that stochastic dispersal processes initially govern the assemblage of species in discrete shrub clusters developing in grassland, but that community structure subsequently develops through the progressive action of first positive, then negative interactions among species. A comparison of observed patterns of occurrence and niche models for 12 shrub cluster species against neutral predictions revealed that neutral stochastic, island biogeographic processes accounted for most patterns of species occurrence. One species showed strong evidence of successional differentiation, whereas evidence of slight recruitment biases for five others was equivocal. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of an approach that accommodates contributions of both neutral and niche assembly rather than assuming either process alone is sufficient to account for community structure. Further development and testing of robust and falsifiable neutral theory will allow ecologists to critically evaluate the relative roles of niche differentiation and neutral, stochastic processes in structuring communities.
生态群落结构的研究需要超越生态位和中性理论之间的二分法,采用更广泛的概念框架,以容纳中性随机和生物结构过程在组织物种组合中的作用。我们提出并测试了一个框架,该框架整合了生态位和中性组合的观点,并确定了它们在塑造林地草原中不同灌木物种组合结构中的相对贡献。我们的方法提出,随机扩散过程最初支配着在草原中形成的离散灌木簇的物种组合,但随后通过物种之间的正相互作用和负相互作用的逐步作用,群落结构逐渐发展。将 12 个灌木群物种的出现模式和生态位模型与中性预测进行比较表明,中性随机、岛屿生物地理学过程解释了大多数物种出现的模式。一种物种表现出强烈的演替分化证据,而另外五种物种的微弱招募偏差证据则存在争议。我们的结果表明,一种能够容纳中性和生态位组合的贡献的方法是有用的,而不是假设单一过程足以解释群落结构。进一步发展和测试稳健和可证伪的中性理论将使生态学家能够批判性地评估生态位分化和中性、随机过程在群落结构中的相对作用。