Suppr超能文献

部分生态位分化下的生物多样性维持可能低于中性理论。

Biodiversity maintenance may be lower under partial niche differentiation than under neutrality.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 2004 Kraus Natural Sciences, 830 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.

Centre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Building 3, 2nd floor, Universitetsparken 15, 2100, København Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

Ecology. 2017 Dec;98(12):3211-3218. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2020. Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Abstract

Niche differentiation is normally regarded as a key promoter of species coexistence in competitive systems. One might therefore expect that relative to neutral assemblages, niche-differentiated communities should support more species with longer persistence and lower probability of extinction. Here we compare stochastic niche and neutral dynamics in simulated assemblages, and find that when local dynamics combine with immigration from a regional pool, the effect of niches can be more complex. Trait variation that lessens competition between species will not necessarily give all immigrating species their own niche to occupy. Such partial niche differentiation protects certain species from local extinction, but precipitates exclusion of others. Differences in regional abundances and intrinsic growth rates have similar impacts on persistence times as niche differentiation, and therefore blur the distinction between niche and neutral dynamical patterns-although niche dynamics will influence which species persist longer. Ultimately, unless the number of niches available to species is sufficiently high, niches may actually heighten extinction rates and lower species richness and local persistence times. Our results help make sense of recent observations of community dynamics, and point to the dynamical observations needed to discern the influence of niche differentiation.

摘要

生态位分化通常被认为是竞争系统中物种共存的关键促进因素。因此,人们可能会期望与中性组合相比,生态位分化的群落应该支持更多具有更长持续时间和更低灭绝概率的物种。在这里,我们比较了模拟组合中的随机生态位和中性动态,发现当局部动态与来自区域库的移民相结合时,生态位的影响可能更加复杂。减少物种间竞争的特征变化不一定会为所有移民物种提供自己的生态位。这种部分生态位分化可以保护某些物种免于局部灭绝,但会促使其他物种被排斥。区域丰度和内在增长率的差异对持续时间的影响与生态位分化相同,因此模糊了生态位和中性动态模式之间的区别-尽管生态位动态会影响哪些物种持续时间更长。最终,除非物种可用的生态位数量足够高,否则生态位实际上可能会提高灭绝率,并降低物种丰富度和本地持续时间。我们的结果有助于理解最近的群落动态观察,并指出需要进行动态观察以辨别生态位分化的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验