Suppr超能文献

比较水平和垂直排列的英文文本的阅读速度。

Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text.

作者信息

Yu Deyue, Park Heejung, Gerold David, Legge Gordon E

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2010 Feb 23;10(2):21.1-17. doi: 10.1167/10.2.21.

Abstract

There are three formats for arranging English text for vertical reading-upright letters arranged vertically (marquee), and horizontal text rotated 90 degrees clockwise or counterclockwise. Previous research has shown that reading is slower for all three vertical formats than for horizontal text, with marquee being slowest (M. D. Byrne, 2002). It has been proposed that the size of the visual span-the number of letters recognized with high accuracy without moving the eyes-is a visual factor limiting reading speed. We predicted that reduced visual-span size would be correlated with the slower reading for the three vertical formats. We tested this prediction with uppercase and lowercase letters. Reading performance was measured using two presentation methods: RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation) and flashcard (a block of text on four lines). On average, reading speed for horizontal text was 139% faster than marquee text and 81% faster than the rotated texts. Size of the visual span was highly correlated with changes in reading speed for both lowercase and uppercase letters and for both RSVP and flashcard reading. Our results are consistent with the view that slower reading of vertical text is due to a decrease in the size of the visual span for vertical reading.

摘要

英文文本竖排有三种形式

字母垂直排列(跑马灯式),以及水平文本顺时针或逆时针旋转90度。先前的研究表明,这三种竖排形式的阅读速度都比水平文本慢,其中跑马灯式最慢(M. D. 伯恩,2002年)。有人提出,视觉跨度的大小——即在不移动眼睛的情况下能够高精度识别的字母数量——是限制阅读速度的一个视觉因素。我们预测,视觉跨度大小的减小将与这三种竖排形式较慢的阅读速度相关。我们用大写字母和小写字母对这一预测进行了测试。阅读表现通过两种呈现方式来衡量:快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)和抽认卡(四行文本块)。平均而言,水平文本的阅读速度比跑马灯式文本快139%,比旋转文本快81%。视觉跨度大小与小写字母和大写字母的阅读速度变化高度相关,且与RSVP和抽认卡阅读均高度相关。我们的结果与以下观点一致,即竖排文本阅读速度较慢是由于竖排阅读时视觉跨度大小减小所致。

相似文献

1
Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text.
J Vis. 2010 Feb 23;10(2):21.1-17. doi: 10.1167/10.2.21.
2
Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.
J Vis. 2007 Feb 1;7(2):2.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.2.2.
4
Developmental changes in the visual span for reading.
Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(22):2889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
6
Learning to read vertical text in peripheral vision.
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Sep;91(9):1097-105. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000344.
7
Relationship between visual span and reading performance in age-related macular degeneration.
Vision Res. 2008 Feb;48(4):577-88. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.11.022. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
8
Spatial-frequency requirements for reading revisited.
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.03.025. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
9
Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration.
Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(23):2943-55. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.
J Vis. 2007 Mar 7;7(2):9.1-15. doi: 10.1167/7.2.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention Dynamics in Spatial-Temporal Contexts.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;15(5):599. doi: 10.3390/bs15050599.
2
The role of predictive and preview effects in Mongolian reading: evidence from eye movements.
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1420223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420223. eCollection 2024.
5
The Effect of Claustrophobic Tendencies on Digital Spatial Preferences.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 23;13:874765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874765. eCollection 2022.
6
Eye movements in frontotemporal dementia: Abnormalities of fixation, saccades and anti-saccades.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Dec 31;7(1):e12218. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12218. eCollection 2021.
7
Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Aug;50(4):815-830. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09748-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
8
Training of vertical versus horizontal reading in patients with hemianopia - a randomized and controlled study.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;259(3):745-757. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04952-w. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
9
How Does Vertical Reading Affect Reading Speed?
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2020 Aug 5;16(1):38-43. doi: 10.22599/bioj.149.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision.
Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.005.
2
Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of MNREAD data.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Feb;49(2):828-35. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0555.
3
Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate.
J Vis. 2007 Oct 26;7(2):20.1-36. doi: 10.1167/7.2.20.
4
Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects.
J Vis. 2007 Jul 17;7(2):13.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.2.13.
5
The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading.
J Vis. 2007 Mar 7;7(2):9.1-15. doi: 10.1167/7.2.9.
6
Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed.
J Vis. 2007 Feb 1;7(2):2.1-10. doi: 10.1167/7.2.2.
7
Developmental changes in the visual span for reading.
Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(22):2889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
8
Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision.
Vision Res. 2007 Sep;47(19):2499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
9
Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathway contributions to visual field anisotropies.
Vision Res. 2007 Aug;47(17):2327-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.013.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验