Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, USA.
Inhal Toxicol. 2010 Jun;22 Suppl 1:1-19. doi: 10.3109/08958371003793846.
Ambient air pollution is always encountered as a complex mixture, but past regulatory and research strategies largely focused on single pollutants, pollutant classes, and sources one-at-a-time. There is a trend toward managing air quality in a progressively "multipollutant" manner, with the idealized goal of controlling as many air contaminants as possible in an integrated manner to achieve the greatest total reduction of adverse health and environmental impacts. This commentary considers the current ability of the environmental air pollution exposure and health research communities to provide evidence to inform the development of multipollutant air quality management strategies and assess their effectiveness. The commentary is not a literature review, but a summary of key issues and information gaps, strategies for filling the gaps, and realistic expectations for progress that could be made during the next decade. The greatest need is for researchers and sponsors to address air quality health impacts from a truly multipollutant perspective, and the most limiting current information gap is knowledge of personal exposures of different subpopulations, considering activities and microenvironments. Emphasis is needed on clarifying the roles of a broader range of pollutants and their combinations in a more forward-looking manner; that is not driven by current regulatory structures. Although advances in research tools and outcome data will enhance progress, the greater need is to direct existing capabilities toward strategies aimed at placing into proper context the contributions of multiple pollutants and their combinations to the health burdens, and the relative contributions of pollutants and other factors influencing the same outcomes. The authors conclude that the research community has very limited ability to advise multipollutant air quality management and assess its effectiveness at this time, but that considerable progress can be made in a decade, even at current funding levels, if resources and incentives are shifted appropriately.
大气污染通常是一种复杂的混合物,但过去的监管和研究策略主要集中在单一污染物、污染物类别和逐个污染源上。目前,有一种倾向是用一种“多污染物”的方式来管理空气质量,其理想化的目标是综合控制尽可能多的空气污染物,以最大程度地减少对健康和环境的不利影响。
本评论考虑了当前环境空气污染暴露和健康研究界提供证据以支持制定多污染物空气质量管理策略并评估其有效性的能力。本评论不是文献综述,而是对关键问题和信息差距、填补差距的策略以及未来十年可能取得进展的现实期望的总结。最大的需求是研究人员和赞助商从真正的多污染物角度来解决空气质量对健康的影响,而当前最受限制的信息差距是不同亚人群的个人暴露知识,同时要考虑活动和微观环境。需要强调的是,需要更前瞻性地阐明更广泛的污染物及其组合的作用;而不是受当前监管结构的驱动。尽管研究工具和结果数据的进步将推动进展,但更需要的是将现有能力集中用于制定策略,以正确认识多种污染物及其组合对健康负担的贡献,以及污染物和其他影响相同结果的因素的相对贡献。
作者得出结论,目前研究界在为多污染物空气质量管理提供建议和评估其效果方面的能力非常有限,但如果资源和激励措施得到适当调整,即使在当前的资金水平下,未来十年也可以取得相当大的进展。