• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PillCam 结肠胶囊内镜:一项比较两种准备方案的前瞻性、随机试验。

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation.

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;45(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181dac04b.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181dac04b
PMID:20463587
Abstract

GOAL

Aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of substituting sodium phosphate (NaP) with polyethylene glycol (PEG)-boosters in the protocol preparation for PillCam Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE).

BACKGROUND

CCE represents a new diagnostic, endoscopic technology for colonic exploration. Bowel preparation for CCE is necessary not only to clean the colon, but also to promote capsule propulsion. For this reason, NaP boosters have been added to a 4 L PEG-preparation. NaP has been recently related with major side-effects.

STUDY

Forty patients were prospectively randomized to Standard (n=20) or Modified (n=20) regimen. Standard regimen included clear liquid diet, 4 L of PEG, and 1 or 2 NaP boosters. In the Modified regimen, NaP boosters were substituted by 1 or 2 PEG boosters; 4 senna tablets and a low-residue diet were also included. Patients underwent CCE and conventional colonoscopy, carried out on the same day. CCE excretion rate, colon transit time, colon cleansing, and accuracy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Hundred percent and 75% of CCE were excreted with the Standard and Modified regimen, respectively (P=0.02). Mean±SE colonic transit time of capsule was 2.17±1.43 hours in the Standard group, and 5.32±2.53 hours in the Modified group (P<0.001). Adequate preparation was achieved in 42.5% of the cases, without statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (35% vs. 53%; P=NS). CCE sensitivity and specificity for ≥6 mm polyps were 63% and 87%, without difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The exclusion of NaP booster from CCE preparation resulted into a clinically meaningful reduction of the capsule excretion rate that was only partially compensated by the PEG booster.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在 PillCam 结肠胶囊内镜(CCE)方案准备中用聚乙二醇(PEG)增强剂替代磷酸钠(NaP)的可行性。

背景

CCE 代表了一种新的诊断性内镜结肠检查技术。CCE 肠道准备不仅需要清洁结肠,还需要促进胶囊推进。因此,在 4 L PEG 准备液中加入了 NaP 增强剂。最近,NaP 与主要副作用有关。

研究

40 例患者前瞻性随机分为标准(n=20)或改良(n=20)组。标准方案包括清淡饮食、4 L PEG 和 1 或 2 个 NaP 增强剂。在改良方案中,用 1 或 2 个 PEG 增强剂替代 NaP 增强剂;还包括 4 片番泻叶和低残留饮食。患者同日进行 CCE 和常规结肠镜检查。评估 CCE 排泄率、结肠传输时间、结肠清洁度和准确性。

结果

标准组和改良组分别有 100%和 75%的 CCE 排出(P=0.02)。标准组胶囊平均结肠传输时间为 2.17±1.43 小时,改良组为 5.32±2.53 小时(P<0.001)。42.5%的病例达到了充分的准备,两组之间无统计学差异(35%比 53%;P=NS)。CCE 对≥6mm 息肉的敏感性和特异性分别为 63%和 87%,两组之间无差异。

结论

在 CCE 准备中排除 NaP 增强剂导致胶囊排泄率显著降低,但仅部分由 PEG 增强剂补偿。

相似文献

1
PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation.PillCam 结肠胶囊内镜:一项比较两种准备方案的前瞻性、随机试验。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;45(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181dac04b.
2
Is PillCam COLON capsule endoscopy ready for colorectal cancer screening? A prospective feasibility study in a community gastroenterology practice.结肠 PillCam 胶囊内镜检查是否适用于结直肠癌筛查?一项社区胃肠病学实践中的前瞻性可行性研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):848-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.163. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
A new regimen of bowel preparation for PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study.PillCam 结肠胶囊内镜检查的新肠道准备方案:一项初步研究。
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Apr;43(4):300-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
4
Could the colonic capsule PillCam Colon be clinically useful for selecting patients who deserve a complete colonoscopy?: results of clinical comparison with colonoscopy in the perspective of colorectal cancer screening.结肠胶囊式内窥镜 PillCam Colon 对临床选择需要全结肠镜检查的患者是否有用?以结直肠癌筛查为视角的临床对比研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 May;105(5):1076-86. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.624. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
5
PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: the patient's perspective.结肠胶囊内镜检查:患者视角
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):194-5; author reply 195. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.025.
6
A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy.一项比较不同口服磷酸钠方案和聚乙二醇灌肠液在结肠镜检查患者肠道准备中的随机前瞻性试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.09.030.
7
A pilot study evaluating a new low-volume colon cleansing procedure for capsule colonoscopy.一项评估新型小容量结肠清洁程序用于胶囊结肠镜检查的初步研究。
Endoscopy. 2012 May;44(5):482-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291611. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
A randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for polyp detection.用于息肉检测的磷酸钠片剂和聚乙二醇溶液的随机对照试验。
J Dig Dis. 2012 Jul;13(7):374-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2012.00588.x.
9
Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.第二代结肠胶囊与结肠镜前瞻性多中心性能评估比较。
Endoscopy. 2009 Dec;41(12):1026-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215360. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
10
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy.第二代结肠胶囊内镜与结肠镜检查的比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep;74(3):581-589.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.1125. Epub 2011 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Optimal Bowel Preparation for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-intestinal Capsule Endoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.胶囊结肠镜和全肠道胶囊内镜检查的最佳肠道准备是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4418-4431. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08133-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
Clinical utility of colon capsule endoscopy: a moving target?结肠胶囊内镜的临床应用:一个不断变化的目标?
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 9;16:17562848231195680. doi: 10.1177/17562848231195680. eCollection 2023.
3
The Prediction of Inadequate Colon Capsule Cleansing: A Cohort Selection Guided by CC-CLEAR.
结肠胶囊清洁不充分的预测:基于CC-CLEAR的队列选择
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 14;29(5):311-321. doi: 10.1159/000518588. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colon Polyps: Who Needs a Colonoscopy?结肠胶囊内镜在结肠息肉诊断中的应用:谁需要进行结肠镜检查?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;12(9):2093. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092093.
5
Efficacy of bowel preparation regimens for colon capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于结肠胶囊内镜检查的肠道准备方案的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1658-E1673. doi: 10.1055/a-1529-5814. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Lavage, Simethicone, and Prokinetics-What to Swallow with a Video Capsule.洗胃、西甲硅油与促动力药——视频胶囊检查时该服用什么。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 18;11(9):1711. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091711.
7
Colon capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: lessons from a national 5-year observational prospective cohort.临床实践中的结肠胶囊内镜检查:来自一项全国性5年观察性前瞻性队列研究的经验教训。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1542-E1548. doi: 10.1055/a-1526-0923. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy.用于结肠镜筛查转诊个体中结直肠肿瘤检测的结肠胶囊内镜检查的准确性
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Sep 3;2019:5975438. doi: 10.1155/2019/5975438. eCollection 2019.
9
Colon Capsule Visualization Is Not Enhanced with Prucalopride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.普芦卡必利未增强结肠胶囊可视化效果:一项随机对照试验
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr 13;1(1):20-25. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwy005. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Intra and inter-observer agreement on polyp detection in colon capsule endoscopy evaluations.结肠胶囊内镜检查评估中息肉检测的观察者内和观察者间一致性
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1563-1568. doi: 10.1177/2050640618798182. Epub 2018 Sep 11.