Suppr超能文献

改善心血管药物治疗依从性的干预措施中医生的效力:系统评价。

Physician effectiveness in interventions to improve cardiovascular medication adherence: a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Oct;25(10):1090-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1387-9. Epub 2010 May 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medications for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease save lives but adherence is often inadequate. The optimal role for physicians in improving adherence remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Using existing evidence, we set the goal of evaluating the physician's role in improving medication adherence.

DESIGN

We conducted systematic searches of English-language peer-reviewed publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through 12/31/2008.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

We selected randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve adherence to medications used for preventing or treating cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

MAIN MEASURES

Articles were classified as either (1) physician "active"-a physician participated in designing or implementing the intervention; (2) physician "passive"-physicians treating intervention group patients received patient adherence information while physicians treating controls did not; or (3) physicians noninvolved. We also identified studies in which healthcare professionals helped deliver the intervention. We did a meta-analysis of the studies involving healthcare professionals to determine aggregate Cohen's D effect sizes (ES).

KEY RESULTS

We identified 6,550 articles; 168 were reviewed in full, 82 met inclusion criteria. The majority of all studies (88.9%) showed improved adherence. Physician noninvolved studies were more likely (35.0% of studies) to show a medium or large effect on adherence compared to physician-involved studies (31.3%). Among interventions requiring a healthcare professional, physician-noninvolved interventions were more effective (ES 0.47; 95% CI 0.38-0.56) than physician-involved interventions (ES 0.25; 95% CI 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001). Among physician-involved interventions, physician-passive interventions were marginally more effective (ES 0.29; 95% CI 0.22-0.36) than physician-active interventions (ES 0.23; 95% CI 0.17-0.28; p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence interventions utilizing non-physician healthcare professionals are effective in improving cardiovascular medication adherence, but further study is needed to identify the optimal role for physicians.

摘要

背景

用于预防和治疗心血管疾病的药物可以挽救生命,但患者的用药依从性往往不够理想。医生在提高用药依从性方面的最佳作用仍不明确。

目的

利用现有证据,我们设定了评估医生在改善药物依从性方面作用的目标。

设计

我们对从 1966 年至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中发表的英文同行评议文献进行了系统检索。

研究对象和干预措施

我们选择了旨在提高用于预防或治疗心血管疾病或糖尿病的药物的用药依从性的干预措施的随机对照试验。

主要观察指标

文章被分为以下 3 类:(1)医生“主动”——医生参与设计或实施干预措施;(2)医生“被动”——接受干预组治疗的医生获得患者用药依从性信息,而接受对照组治疗的医生未获得;或(3)医生不参与。我们还确定了医疗保健专业人员帮助实施干预措施的研究。我们对涉及医疗保健专业人员的研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定综合 Cohen's D 效应量(ES)。

主要结果

我们共识别出 6550 篇文章,对其中 168 篇进行了全文评价,有 82 篇符合纳入标准。所有研究中,大多数(88.9%)显示出用药依从性的改善。与医生参与的研究(31.3%)相比,医生不参与的研究(35.0%)更有可能显示出对用药依从性的中等或较大影响。在需要医疗保健专业人员的干预措施中,医生不参与的干预措施(ES 0.47;95% CI 0.38-0.56)比医生参与的干预措施(ES 0.25;95% CI 0.21-0.29;p < 0.001)更有效。在医生参与的干预措施中,医生被动干预措施的效果略高于医生主动干预措施(ES 0.29;95% CI 0.22-0.36)(p = 0.2)。

结论

利用非医师医疗保健专业人员的依从性干预措施可以有效提高心血管药物的依从性,但仍需要进一步研究以确定医生的最佳作用。

相似文献

3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.改善哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD012226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012226.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Adherence Barriers to Treatment of Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Qualitative Study.心血管疾病患者治疗的依从性障碍:一项定性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Aug 9;27(4):317-324. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_307_21. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.

本文引用的文献

8
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验