Breslin Curtis, Smith Peter
Institute for Work and Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;16(2):225-9.
This commentary responds to Sudhinaraset and Blum's article in this issue, and seeks to integrate a growing body of development research into existing occupational health and safety (OHS) research, policy and practice. We suggest that it is useful to distinguish between research questions regarding minimum age restrictions for hazardous tasks and jobs from research questions about the degree to which developmental factors contribute to elevated work injury risk for youth compared to adults. Epidemiological evidence indicates that known OHS risk factors adversely affect workers of all ages to a similar extent; a balanced approach is needed to integrate emerging developmental research with existing epidemiological research so that the abilities of young workers are not prejudged solely on the basis of age and brain maturation. Further, the heterogeneity of cognitive and self-regulatory functioning at any age suggests that architectural principles of Universal Design be employed in OHS training and hazard reduction.
本评论回应了本期Sudhinaraset和Blum的文章,并试图将越来越多的发展研究纳入现有的职业健康与安全(OHS)研究、政策及实践中。我们认为,区分关于危险任务和工作的最低年龄限制的研究问题与关于发展因素在多大程度上导致青年工人相比成年人工伤风险升高的研究问题是有用的。流行病学证据表明,已知的职业健康与安全风险因素对所有年龄段的工人都有类似程度的不利影响;需要一种平衡的方法将新兴的发展研究与现有的流行病学研究结合起来,以免仅仅根据年龄和大脑成熟度就预先判断青年工人的能力。此外,任何年龄段认知和自我调节功能的异质性表明,通用设计的架构原则应应用于职业健康与安全培训及减少危害方面。