Suppr超能文献

[一组老年住院患者认知筛查测试及简易精神状态检查表的效度]

[Validity of the cognitive screening tests and the mini-mental status examination in a group of elderly hospital patients].

作者信息

Dautzenberg P L, Schmand B, Vriens M T, Deelman B G, Hooijer C

机构信息

Slotervaartziekenhuis, afd. Geriatrie en Neurologie, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1991 May 11;135(19):850-5.

PMID:2046783
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the validity of the cognitive screening test (CST) and of the mini-mental state examination (MMS).

DESIGN

Prospective administration of both CST and MMS (in balanced order) by laymen as well as by experienced users, and retrospective comparison of the scores with the clinical diagnosis and with the degree of functioning in activities of everyday life.

SETTING

Clinical and outpatient departments of Geriatrics and Neurology of the Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Ninety-five patients of the clinical and nine patients of the outpatient departments, with an acute somatic diagnostic problem and multiple pathology attending the above-named departments in the period from September 1989 to February 1990: 20 patients (group SOM) were found not to have a dementia syndrome; 25 patients (group DEM) had a dementia syndrome as the main diagnosis; 14 patients (group CVA) had a cerebrovascular accident as the main diagnosis without clinical signs of dementia; 45 patients were excluded from the comparison (30 because of main diagnosis from several groups and 15 because of pathology that might influence the test scores to an unpredictable degree). The data were analysed statistically by means of analyses of confidence and of variance.

RESULTS

The CST was found to be more reliable and less time-consuming than the MMS. The sensitivities of the two tests with regard to the distinction between dementia and somatic pathology were similar (80%). However, specificity of the CST was better than that of the MMS (80% and 60%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For the screening of older patients for dementia, the CST constitutes a good alternative to the MMS.

摘要

目的

研究认知筛查测试(CST)和简易精神状态检查表(MMS)的有效性。

设计

由外行人以及经验丰富的使用者对CST和MMS进行前瞻性施测(顺序均衡),并将得分与临床诊断以及日常生活活动功能程度进行回顾性比较。

地点

阿姆斯特丹斯洛特费尔特医院老年病科和神经科的临床及门诊科室。

患者与方法

1989年9月至1990年2月期间,上述科室收治的95例临床患者和9例门诊患者,均存在急性躯体诊断问题且有多种病理情况:20例患者(SOM组)未患痴呆综合征;25例患者(DEM组)以痴呆综合征作为主要诊断;14例患者(CVA组)以脑血管意外作为主要诊断但无痴呆临床体征;45例患者被排除在比较范围之外(30例因主要诊断来自多个组,15例因可能对测试分数产生不可预测影响的病理情况)。数据通过置信度分析和方差分析进行统计学分析。

结果

发现CST比MMS更可靠且耗时更少。两种测试在区分痴呆和躯体病理方面的敏感性相似(80%)。然而,CST的特异性优于MMS(分别为80%和60%)。

结论

对于老年患者痴呆的筛查,CST是MMS的一个很好的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验