Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
J Microbiol Methods. 2010 Aug;82(2):124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 12.
A wide range of methods are commonly used for preserving environmental samples prior to molecular analyses. However, the effect of these preservation methods on fungal DNA is not understood. The objective of this study was to test the effect of eight different preservation methods on the quality and yield of DNA extracted from Bromus inermis and Daucus carota roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, Glomus intraradices. The total DNA concentration in sample extracts was quantified using spectrophotometry. Samples that were frozen (-80 masculineC and -20 masculineC), stored in 95% ethanol, or silica gel dried yielded total (plant and fungal) DNA concentrations that were not significantly different from fresh samples. In contrast, samples stored in CTAB solution or freeze-dried resulted in significantly reduced DNA concentrations compared with fresh samples. The preservation methods had no effect on the purity of the sample extracts for both plant species. However, the DNA of the dried samples (silica gel dried, freeze-dried, heat dried) appeared to be slightly more degraded compared with samples that remained hydrated (frozen, stored in ethanol or CTAB solutions) during storage when visualized on a gel. The concentration of AM fungal DNA in sample extracts was quantified using TaqMan real time PCR. Methods that preserved samples in hydrated form had similar AM fungal DNA concentrations as fresh samples, except D. carota samples stored in ethanol. In contrast, preservation methods that involved drying the samples had very low concentrations of AM fungal DNA for B. inermis, and nearly undetectable for D. carota samples. The drying process appears to be a major factor in the degradation of AM fungal DNA while having less of an impact on plant DNA. Based on these results, samples that need to be preserved prior to molecular analysis of AM fungi should be kept frozen to minimize the degradation of plant and AM fungal DNA.
在进行分子分析之前,通常会使用多种方法来保存环境样本。然而,这些保存方法对真菌 DNA 的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是测试八种不同的保存方法对受丛枝菌根(AM)真菌 Glomus intraradices 定殖的白茅草和胡萝卜根的 DNA 质量和产量的影响。使用分光光度法对样品提取物中的总 DNA 浓度进行定量。冷冻(-80°C 和-20°C)、储存在 95%乙醇或硅胶干燥的样品的总(植物和真菌)DNA 浓度与新鲜样品没有显著差异。相比之下,保存在 CTAB 溶液或冻干的样品的 DNA 浓度与新鲜样品相比显著降低。保存方法对两种植物的样品提取物的纯度没有影响。然而,与保持水合状态的样品(冷冻、储存在乙醇或 CTAB 溶液中)相比,干燥样品(硅胶干燥、冻干、热干燥)的 DNA 似乎在储存过程中略有降解,在凝胶上观察时更为明显。使用 TaqMan 实时 PCR 定量样品提取物中的 AM 真菌 DNA 浓度。以水合形式保存样品的方法与新鲜样品具有相似的 AM 真菌 DNA 浓度,除了储存在乙醇中的胡萝卜样品。相比之下,涉及干燥样品的保存方法对白茅草的 AM 真菌 DNA 浓度非常低,而胡萝卜样品的 AM 真菌 DNA 浓度几乎无法检测到。干燥过程似乎是 AM 真菌 DNA 降解的主要因素,而对植物 DNA 的影响较小。基于这些结果,需要在进行 AM 真菌分子分析之前保存的样品应保持冷冻状态,以最大程度地减少植物和 AM 真菌 DNA 的降解。