School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Popul Health Metr. 2010 May 18;8:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-13.
Ascertainment of cause for deaths that occur in the absence of medical attention is a significant problem in many countries, including Thailand, where more than 50% of such deaths are registered with ill-defined causes. Routine implementation of standardized, rigorous verbal autopsy methods is a potential solution. This paper reports findings from field research conducted to develop, test, and validate the use of verbal autopsy (VA) methods in Thailand.
International verbal autopsy methods were first adapted to the Thai context and then implemented to ascertain causes of death for a nationally representative sample of 11,984 deaths that occurred in Thailand in 2005. Causes of death were derived from completed VA questionnaires by physicians trained in ICD-based cause-of-death certification. VA diagnoses were validated in the sample of hospital deaths for which reference diagnoses were available from medical record review. Validated study findings were used to adjust VA-based causes of death derived for deaths in the study sample that had occurred outside hospitals. Results were used to estimate cause-specific mortality patterns for deaths outside hospitals in Thailand in 2005.
VA-based causes of death were derived for 6,328 out of 7,340 deaths in the study sample that had occurred outside hospitals, constituting the verification arm of the study. The use of VA resulted in large-scale reassignment of deaths from ill-defined categories to specific causes of death. The validation study identified that VA tends to overdiagnose important causes such as diabetes, liver cancer, and tuberculosis, while undercounting deaths from HIV/AIDS, liver diseases, genitourinary (essential renal), and digestive system disorders.
The use of standard VA methods adapted to Thailand enabled a plausible assessment of cause-specific mortality patterns and a substantial reduction of ill-defined diagnoses. Validation studies enhance the utility of findings from the application of verbal autopsy. Regular implementation of VA in Thailand could accelerate development of the quality and utility of vital registration data for deaths outside hospitals.
在许多国家,包括泰国,确定没有医疗照顾情况下发生的死亡原因是一个重大问题,超过 50%的此类死亡被登记为原因不明。常规实施标准化、严格的死因推断方法是一个潜在的解决方案。本文报告了在泰国开展的现场研究结果,该研究旨在开发、测试和验证死因推断方法的使用。
首先将国际死因推断方法适应当地情况,然后用于确定 2005 年在泰国发生的具有全国代表性的 11984 例死亡的死亡原因。通过接受过 ICD 死因认证培训的医生填写死因推断调查问卷来推断死亡原因。在可从病历审查中获得参考诊断的医院死亡样本中对死因推断诊断进行验证。利用验证性研究结果调整在研究样本中发生在医院外的死因推断死亡原因。研究结果用于估计 2005 年泰国医院外死亡的特定原因死亡率模式。
为研究样本中发生在医院外的 6328 例死亡中的 7340 例得出了死因推断结果,这构成了研究的验证部分。死因推断的使用导致大量将死因不明的死亡重新归类为特定的死亡原因。验证性研究发现,死因推断往往会过度诊断重要原因,如糖尿病、肝癌和结核病,而低估了艾滋病毒/艾滋病、肝脏疾病、泌尿生殖系统(主要肾脏)和消化系统疾病导致的死亡。
适用于泰国的标准死因推断方法的使用使对特定原因死亡率模式进行合理评估,并大幅减少了原因不明的诊断。验证性研究提高了死因推断应用结果的实用性。在泰国定期实施死因推断可以加速发展对医院外死亡的质量和实用性更高的生命登记数据。