Bults Marloes, Beaujean Desirée J M A, de Zwart Onno, Kok Gerjo, van Empelen Pepijn, van Steenbergen Jim E, Richardus Jan Hendrik, Voeten Hélène A C M
GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1686.
To gain insight into how the Dutch general public viewed the risk during the course of the recent pandemic, into how many and which people took precautionary measures, and into the extent to which people trust the information provided by the government.
Online survey, cross-sectional (the first two measurements) and follow-up investigations (the last two measurements).
Between 10 and 17 November 2009, 754 people completed the online questionnaire. Earlier survey rounds were held in May (n = 572), June (n = 620) and August (n = 934).
In November 2009, 38% of respondents considered the Mexican flu a serious disease and 36% viewed themselves as vulnerable to this flu. Feelings of anxiety had decreased versus earlier survey rounds. Of the respondents, 73% took precautionary measures against the disease. This concerned mainly hygiene measures, which were most frequently taken by people who were anxious, found hygiene measures effective, paid considerable attention to the media information on flu, and found information from the government reliable and those without children living at home. More than fifty percent (58%) of respondents indicated that they would be willing to have the vaccination if they would be eligible for this. Of the other 315 respondents, 40% indicated that they feared serious side effects, 35% that they doubted the effectiveness of the vaccine and 33% that they considered the vaccine to be insufficiently tested. Almost half of the respondents had read the information leaflet 'Fight the flu', which was sent to every home in the country. One third had seen the television campaign. Governmental institutions, notably the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, were the most important sources of information and more than half of the respondents trusted this information.
During the course of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, anxiety among the Dutch general public decreased progressively, while people increasingly considered themselves more vulnerable to the flu. The public therefore had a realistic view of the situation. Three quarters of the general public had taken precautionary measures against the flu. More than fifty percent would be willing to have the vaccination if they would be eligible for this. The most important reason for not wanting the vaccination was fear of serious side effects and doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine. This is a point of attention for the development of public information campaigns about vaccinations in the future.
深入了解荷兰普通民众在近期疫情期间如何看待风险,有多少人以及哪些人采取了预防措施,以及民众对政府提供信息的信任程度。
在线调查,横断面调查(前两次测量)和随访调查(后两次测量)。
2009年11月10日至17日,754人完成了在线问卷。早期的调查轮次分别在5月(n = 572)、6月(n = 620)和8月(n = 934)进行。
2009年11月,38%的受访者认为甲型H1N1流感是一种严重疾病,36%的受访者认为自己易感染这种流感。与早期调查轮次相比,焦虑情绪有所下降。在受访者中,73%的人采取了预防该疾病的措施。这主要涉及卫生措施,焦虑的人、认为卫生措施有效的人、非常关注流感媒体信息的人、认为政府信息可靠的人以及家中没有孩子的人最常采取这些措施。超过50%(58%)的受访者表示,如果有资格接种疫苗,他们愿意接种。在其他315名受访者中,40%表示担心有严重副作用,35%怀疑疫苗的有效性,33%认为疫苗测试不充分。近一半的受访者阅读了发送到该国每户家庭的“抗击流感”宣传册。三分之一的人看过电视宣传活动。政府机构,特别是卫生、福利和体育部以及国家公共卫生和环境研究所,是最重要的信息来源,超过一半的受访者信任这些信息。
在2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行期间,荷兰普通民众的焦虑情绪逐渐下降,而人们越来越认为自己更容易感染流感。因此,公众对形势有现实的看法。四分之三的公众采取了预防流感的措施。如果有资格接种疫苗,超过50%的人愿意接种。不想接种疫苗的最重要原因是担心有严重副作用和怀疑疫苗的有效性。这是未来开展疫苗接种公共宣传活动时需要关注的一点。