• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低容量(2 升)聚乙二醇与单剂量或分剂量聚乙二醇肠道准备用于上午结肠镜检查的柠檬酸镁的疗效和耐受性:

Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1319-26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.79. Epub 2010 May 18.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2010.79
PMID:20485282
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Preparation regimens for morning colonoscopy are suboptimal. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and tolerance of a split-dose magnesium citrate-low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen for morning colonoscopy.

METHODS

A total of 232 patients were randomly assigned to receive 4 liters PEG (day before procedure; group 1, n=79), 2 liters PEG (day before procedure) followed by another 2 liters PEG (day of procedure; group 2, n=80), or magnesium citrate (250 ml, day before procedure) followed by 2 liters PEG (day of procedure; group 3, n=73). The quality of bowel cleansing, tolerability, and adverse effects in group 3 were compared with those in groups 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Satisfactory bowel preparation was more frequently reported for group 3 than for group 1 (75% vs. 51%, P=0.001) and was similar to that for group 2 (75% vs. 76%, P=0.896). A significantly greater proportion of patients in group 3 graded their overall satisfaction as satisfactory compared with group 1 (43% vs. 23%, P=0.010), and the proportion was similar to that in group 2 (43% vs. 35%, P=0.133). Patients in group 3 were more willing to repeat the same preparation regimen, if necessary, than those in group 1 (93% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or group 2 (93% vs. 62%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The split-dose magnesium citrate-low-volume (2 liters) PEG regimen was more efficient than and preferred to the conventional regimen of 4 liters of PEG, and it was equally efficient as, but, again, preferred to the split-dose (2+2 liters) regimen for morning colonoscopy.

摘要

目的

用于早晨结肠镜检查的准备方案并不理想。本研究的目的是测试镁柠檬酸-低容量(2 升)聚乙二醇(PEG)方案在早晨结肠镜检查中的疗效和耐受性。

方法

共有 232 名患者被随机分配接受 4 升 PEG(检查前一天;第 1 组,n=79)、2 升 PEG(检查前一天)加 2 升 PEG(检查当天;第 2 组,n=80)或镁柠檬酸(250 毫升,检查前一天)加 2 升 PEG(检查当天;第 3 组,n=73)。第 3 组的肠道清洁质量、耐受性和不良反应与第 1 组和第 2 组进行了比较。

结果

第 3 组报告的肠道准备满意度明显高于第 1 组(75%比 51%,P=0.001),与第 2 组相似(75%比 76%,P=0.896)。第 3 组患者中,有更多的患者对整体满意度评价为满意,而第 1 组(43%比 23%,P=0.010),且比例与第 2 组相似(43%比 35%,P=0.133)。第 3 组患者如果需要,更愿意重复相同的准备方案,而第 1 组(93%比 48%,P<0.001)或第 2 组(93%比 62%,P<0.001)。

结论

与 4 升 PEG 相比,镁柠檬酸-低容量(2 升)PEG 方案更有效且更受患者欢迎,与 2+2 升 PEG 方案相比,其效率相同,但也更受患者欢迎,用于早晨结肠镜检查。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose magnesium citrate: low-volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol vs. single- or split-dose polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy.低容量(2 升)聚乙二醇与单剂量或分剂量聚乙二醇肠道准备用于上午结肠镜检查的柠檬酸镁的疗效和耐受性:
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1319-26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.79. Epub 2010 May 18.
2
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.前瞻性研究低容量聚乙二醇(2L)与标准容量聚乙二醇(4L)、枸橼酸镁联合刺激性泻药在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;46(7):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162.
3
A single or split dose picosulphate/magnesium citrate before colonoscopy: comparison regarding tolerance and efficacy with polyethylene glycol. A randomized trial.结肠镜检查前单次或分次服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:与聚乙二醇在耐受性和疗效方面的比较。一项随机试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.vk1.
4
Low-volume hybrid bowel preparation combining saline laxatives with oral contrast agents versus standard polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy.低容量混合肠道准备,将盐水泻药与口服对比剂联合使用,与标准聚乙二醇灌洗用于结肠镜检查。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Aug;53(8):1176-81. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d5d9ac.
5
Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.个体化结肠镜肠道准备方案的时间到了吗?一项比较匹克硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与 4 升分剂量聚乙二醇的随机对照试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
6
A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, prospective trial to compare the preference and efficacy of four bowel-cleansing regimens for colonoscopy.一项随机、内镜医师盲法、前瞻性试验,比较四种结肠镜检查肠道清洁方案的偏好性和有效性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):871-7. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.910543. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
Single-day sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate versus split-dose polyethylene glycol for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy: A prospective randomized endoscopist-blinded trial.结肠镜检查前肠道准备:单日服用匹可硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与分剂量服用聚乙二醇的对比研究:一项前瞻性随机内镜医师盲法试验
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1627-34. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13010.
8
Administration of olive oil followed by a low volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution improves patient satisfaction with right-side colonic cleansing over administration of the conventional volume of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation.相较于使用常规剂量的聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液进行结肠镜检查准备,先给予橄榄油再给予少量聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液可提高患者对右侧结肠清洁的满意度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
9
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.
10
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial.结肠镜检查前4升聚乙二醇与小容量溶液的直接比较:哪种最佳?一项多中心随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1763-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2901-x. Epub 2017 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing bowel preparation quality and tolerability in a low health literacy population in Western China: a multicenter randomized trial.提高中国西部低健康素养人群的肠道准备质量和耐受性:一项多中心随机试验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):17957-17971. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05493-5. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
2
Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Different Low-Volume Split-Dose Polyethylene Glycol Electrolytes Solution Bowel Preparation for Morning Colonoscopy.两种不同小容量分次服用聚乙二醇电解质溶液肠道准备方案用于结肠镜检查清晨准备的疗效和耐受性。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug 31;2022:8169649. doi: 10.1155/2022/8169649. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparison of the effect of 1-day and 2-day low residue diets on the quality of bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
对比结肠镜检查前 1 天和 2 天低渣饮食对肠道准备质量的影响。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 May-Jun;26(3):137-143. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_471_19.
4
Polyethylene glycol plus bisacodyl: A safe, cheap, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in the South Asian patients.聚乙二醇加比沙可啶:一种适用于南亚患者结肠镜检查的安全、廉价且有效的方案。
JGH Open. 2018 Aug 10;2(6):249-254. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12077. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Adherence to CRC Screening and Surveillance Guidelines when Using Split-Dose Bowel Preparation.使用分剂量肠道准备时对结直肠癌筛查和监测指南的依从性。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018 Jul 2;2018:8237824. doi: 10.1155/2018/8237824. eCollection 2018.
6
Predictors of patient reluctance to wake early in the morning for bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a precolonoscopy survey in city-wide practice.结肠镜检查肠道准备时患者清晨不愿早起的预测因素:一项全市范围内的结肠镜检查前调查
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jun;6(6):E706-E713. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102298. Epub 2018 May 25.
7
Same-Day Single Dose of 2 Liter Polyethylene Glycol is Not Inferior to The Standard Bowel Preparation Regimen in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.低危患者当日单剂量 2 升聚乙二醇与标准肠道准备方案无差异:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;113(4):601-610. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.25. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查肠道准备的最新进展
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):165-181. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0165-3.
9
The Effectiveness of Personalized Bowel Preparation Using a Smartphone Camera Application: A Randomized Pilot Study.使用智能手机摄像头应用程序进行个性化肠道准备的有效性:一项随机试点研究。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:4898914. doi: 10.1155/2017/4898914. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
Systematic Review: Outcomes by Duration of NPO Status prior to Colonoscopy.系统评价:结肠镜检查前非禁食状态持续时间的结局
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:3914942. doi: 10.1155/2017/3914942. Epub 2017 Jul 16.