• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过非接触式刷牙实现能量转移、体积膨胀以及清除口腔生物膜。

Energy transfer, volumetric expansion, and removal of oral biofilms by non-contact brushing.

作者信息

Busscher H J, Jager D, Finger G, Schaefer N, van der Mei H C

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Apr;118(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00723.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00723.x
PMID:20487007
Abstract

Non-contact removal of oral biofilms offers advantages beyond the reach of bristles, but it is unknown how energy transfer for removal from brush-to-biofilm occurs. In the present study we evaluated non-contact, oral biofilm removal by oscillating-rotating and sonic toothbrushes, and their acoustic output up to 6 mm distance. Whereas some brushes removed biofilm when used at a distance of up to 6 mm, others lost efficacy at a distance of 2-4 mm from the biofilm. Loss of efficacy was accompanied with high standard deviations and volumetric biofilm expansion. Both sonic and oscillating-rotating brushes caused fluid flows and the inclusion of air-bubbles, while non-contact acoustic energy-transfer was demonstrated to decay with distance for both types of brushes. We put forward the following mechanism for non-contact removal: (i) brush energy is absorbed by biofilm, resulting in the visco-elastic expansion of the biofilm; (ii) if the energy absorbed is sufficient and deformation is beyond the yield point, biofilm removal occurs; and (iii) if deformation is in the plastic range but below the yield point (i.e. at the limiting distance for non-contact removal), biofilm is expanded but not removed.

摘要

非接触式清除口腔生物膜具有刷毛无法企及的优势,但尚不清楚从牙刷到生物膜的清除过程中能量是如何传递的。在本研究中,我们评估了振荡旋转牙刷和声波牙刷非接触式清除口腔生物膜的效果,以及它们在距离生物膜6毫米范围内的声学输出。虽然有些牙刷在距离生物膜最远6毫米处使用时能够清除生物膜,但其他牙刷在距离生物膜2 - 4毫米时就失去了效果。效果的丧失伴随着高标准差和生物膜体积膨胀。声波牙刷和振荡旋转牙刷都会引起流体流动并裹挟气泡,同时两种类型的牙刷非接触声能传递均随距离衰减。我们提出了以下非接触式清除机制:(i) 牙刷能量被生物膜吸收,导致生物膜粘弹性膨胀;(ii) 如果吸收的能量足够且变形超过屈服点,则会发生生物膜清除;(iii) 如果变形处于塑性范围内但低于屈服点(即非接触清除的极限距离),生物膜会膨胀但不会被清除。

相似文献

1
Energy transfer, volumetric expansion, and removal of oral biofilms by non-contact brushing.通过非接触式刷牙实现能量转移、体积膨胀以及清除口腔生物膜。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Apr;118(2):177-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00723.x.
2
Influence of weight on removal of co-adhering bacteria from salivary pellicles by different modes of brushing.体重对不同刷牙方式去除唾液薄膜中共黏附细菌的影响。
Caries Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;38(2):85-90. doi: 10.1159/000075930.
3
Impact of hydrodynamics on oral biofilm strength.流体动力学对口腔生物膜强度的影响。
J Dent Res. 2009 Oct;88(10):922-6. doi: 10.1177/0022034509344569.
4
Non-contact removal of coadhering and non-coadhering bacterial pairs from pellicle surfaces by sonic brushing and de novo adhesion.通过声波刷牙和新生黏附从薄膜表面非接触式去除共黏附及非共黏附细菌对。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2003 Dec;111(6):459-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00078.x.
5
Sequence of oral bacterial co-adhesion and non-contact brushing.
J Dent Res. 2007 May;86(5):421-5. doi: 10.1177/154405910708600506.
6
Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal.口腔生物膜模型用于机械性菌斑去除。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):403-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0309-x. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
7
Comparison of the interproximal plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes using in vitro oral biofilms.使用体外口腔生物膜比较两种电动牙刷的邻面菌斑清除效果。
Am J Dent. 2002 Nov;15 Spec No:7B-11B.
8
Co-adhesion and removal of adhering bacteria from salivary pellicles by three different modes of brushing.通过三种不同刷牙方式对唾液薄膜上细菌的共黏附及去除情况
Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Oct;109(5):325-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00071.x.
9
Development of a laboratory model to assess the removal of biofilm from interproximal spaces by powered tooth brushing.开发一种实验室模型,以评估电动牙刷从邻面间隙去除生物膜的效果。
Am J Dent. 2002 Nov;15 Spec No:12B-17B.
10
Interactions between Streptococcus oralis, Actinomyces oris, and Candida albicans in the development of multispecies oral microbial biofilms on salivary pellicle.口腔链球菌、口腔放线菌和白色念珠菌在唾液薄膜上多物种口腔微生物生物膜形成过程中的相互作用。
Mol Oral Microbiol. 2017 Feb;32(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/omi.12154. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The Antimicrobial Effect of a Low-Frequency Square Wave Compared to Chlorhexidine.低频方波与洗必泰相比的抗菌效果。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 2;14(7):2429. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072429.
2
Effect of Dentifrice Ingredients on Volume and Vitality of a Simulated Periodontal Multispecies Biofilm.牙膏成分对模拟牙周多物种生物膜体积和活力的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 May 13;12(5):141. doi: 10.3390/dj12050141.
3
Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor.疾病控制与预防中心生物膜反应器中不锈钢表面生物膜不同采样方法的比较研究
Front Microbiol. 2022 Jun 13;13:892181. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.892181. eCollection 2022.
4
The dental plaque biofilm matrix.牙菌斑生物膜基质。
Periodontol 2000. 2021 Jun;86(1):32-56. doi: 10.1111/prd.12361. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Adjunct use of mouth rinses with a sonic toothbrush accelerates the detachment of a Streptococcus mutans biofilm: an in vitro study.超声牙刷辅助漱口水冲洗加速变形链球菌生物膜脱落:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01144-0.
6
Dental Plaque Removal by Ultrasonic Toothbrushes.超声波牙刷去除牙菌斑
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Mar 23;8(1):28. doi: 10.3390/dj8010028.
7
Computational and Experimental Investigation of Biofilm Disruption Dynamics Induced by High-Velocity Gas Jet Impingement.高速气体射流冲击诱导生物膜破坏动力学的计算与实验研究。
mBio. 2020 Jan 7;11(1):e02813-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02813-19.
8
Influence of the amplitude of different side-to-side toothbrushes on noncontact biofilm removal.不同侧向牙刷振幅对非接触性生物膜去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1951-1957. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2633-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
9
Computational Investigation of Ripple Dynamics in Biofilms in Flowing Systems.流动体系中生物膜纹波动力学的计算研究。
Biophys J. 2018 Oct 2;115(7):1393-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
10
Influence of the oscillation frequency of different side-to-side toothbrushes on noncontact biofilm removal.不同左右对置型牙刷的振荡频率对非接触性生物膜去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2141-2147. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2305-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.