• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 Copaifera multijuga 油树脂的新型根管封闭剂理化性能的实验室评估。

Laboratory evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Federal University of Amazonas-UFAM, Manaus, AM, Brazil.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2010 Apr;43(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01678.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01678.x
PMID:20487447
Abstract

AIM

To compare a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin (Biosealer) using three other established sealers (Sealer 26, Endofill and AH plus) in terms of their physicochemical properties.

METHODOLOGY

The study was carried out according to the requirements of Specification Number 57 of the American Dental Association (ADA) and consisted of the following tests: setting time, flow, film thickness, dimensional stability, radiopacity and solubility/disintegration. Data were analysed statistically using anova and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. The significance level was set at 5% for all analyses.

RESULTS

Sealer 26 and AH Plus had the longest setting time (P < 0.05). All materials presented flow in with the ADA's guidelines. Regarding film thickness, Sealer 26 did not have a satisfactory performance, as it had a higher mean value than the maximum allowed by the ADA (0.05 mm), being significantly different from the other materials (P < 0.05), which had mean values for film thickness in accordance with the ADA's recommendations. Regarding the solubility and disintegration, only Endofill did not meet the ADA's specifications and presented the worst results of all materials (P < 0.05). Sealer 26 presented the greatest dimensional changes and differed significantly from all other sealers (P < 0.05). Biosealer had the lowest radiopacity values and was significantly different from the other sealers (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The experimental sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin presented satisfactory results in the physicochemical tests required by the ADA.

摘要

目的

比较一种基于 Copaifera multijuga 油树脂的新型根管封闭剂(Biosealer)与另外三种已确立的封闭剂(Sealer 26、Endofill 和 AH plus)在理化性能方面的差异。

方法

该研究根据美国牙科协会(ADA)规范 57 号的要求进行,包括以下测试:凝固时间、流动性、薄膜厚度、尺寸稳定性、射线不透性和溶解度/崩解。使用方差分析和 Tukey 多重比较检验对数据进行统计学分析。所有分析的显著性水平均设定为 5%。

结果

Sealer 26 和 AH Plus 的凝固时间最长(P < 0.05)。所有材料的流动性均符合 ADA 指南。关于薄膜厚度,Sealer 26 的性能不理想,其平均值高于 ADA 允许的最大值(0.05mm),与其他材料有显著差异(P < 0.05),这些材料的薄膜厚度平均值符合 ADA 的建议。关于溶解度和崩解性,只有 Endofill 不符合 ADA 的规格,其结果是所有材料中最差的(P < 0.05)。Sealer 26 的尺寸变化最大,与所有其他封闭剂有显著差异(P < 0.05)。Biosealer 的射线不透性值最低,与其他封闭剂有显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

基于 Copaifera multijuga 油树脂的实验性封闭剂在 ADA 要求的理化测试中表现出满意的结果。

相似文献

1
Laboratory evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a new root canal sealer based on Copaifera multijuga oil-resin.基于 Copaifera multijuga 油树脂的新型根管封闭剂理化性能的实验室评估。
Int Endod J. 2010 Apr;43(4):283-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01678.x.
2
Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers.四种根管封闭剂的理化性能评价。
Int Endod J. 2011 Feb;44(2):126-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01815.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
3
Changes in the surface of four calcium silicate-containing endodontic materials and an epoxy resin-based sealer after a solubility test.四种含硅酸钙的根管封闭材料和一种基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂在溶解度测试后的表面变化。
Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):419-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01992.x. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
4
Dimensional alterations and solubility of new endodontic sealers.新型根管封闭剂的尺寸变化与溶解性
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(4):301-4. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000400002.
5
Experimental amine-epoxide sealer: a physicochemical study in comparison with AH Plus and EasySeal.实验性胺-环氧化物封闭剂:与AH Plus和EasySeal的物理化学研究对比
Int Endod J. 2015 Aug;48(8):747-56. doi: 10.1111/iej.12372. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Solubility and dimensional change after setting of root canal sealers: a proposal for smaller dimensions of test samples.根管封闭剂凝固后的溶解度和尺寸变化:关于减小测试样本尺寸的建议。
J Endod. 2007 Sep;33(9):1110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.004.
7
Radiographic and rheological properties of a new endodontic sealer.一种新型根管封闭剂的影像学和流变学特性
Aust Endod J. 2006 Apr;32(1):31-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2006.00005.x.
8
Physical properties and interfacial adaptation of three epoxy resin-based sealers.三种基于环氧树脂的密封剂的物理性能和界面适应性。
J Endod. 2011 Oct;37(10):1417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.06.023. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
9
Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solvents.不同有机溶剂对根管封闭剂的溶解性
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Sep;106(3):e67-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
10
Evaluation of the flow rate of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Obtura.3种根管封闭剂的流速评估:封闭剂26、AH Plus和MTA Obtura。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109(1):e47-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory action of AH-Plus sealer with and without petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin & shilajit: an invitro-study.含与不含蜂斗菜素、茯苓酸、姜黄素及希拉季特的AH-Plus封闭剂的细胞毒性和抗炎作用评估:一项体外研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08761-1.
2
Evaluation of dimensional changes in EndoSeal mineral trioxide aggregate and AH Plus sealers using micro-computed tomography imaging.使用微计算机断层扫描成像评估EndoSeal三氧化物聚合体和AH Plus封闭剂的尺寸变化。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jul 12;21:33. eCollection 2024.
3
Biocompatibility, bioactivity, porosity, and sealer/dentin interface of bioceramic ready-to-use sealers using a dentin-tube model.
生物陶瓷即用型封闭剂的生物相容性、生物活性、孔隙率及与牙本质的密封剂/牙本质界面:基于牙本质管模型的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 22;14(1):16768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66616-7.
4
Nanoleakage of apical sealing using a calcium silicate-based sealer according to canal drying methods.根据根管干燥方法,使用硅酸钙类封闭剂进行根尖封闭的纳米渗漏情况。
Restor Dent Endod. 2024 Apr 19;49(2):e20. doi: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e20. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Characterisation and evaluation of physical properties of AH-Plus sealer with and without the incorporation of petasin, pachymic acid, curcumin and shilajit-an invitro study.含或不含扁柏脂素、羽扇豆酸、姜黄素和喜来芝的 AH-Plus 根管封闭剂物理性能的表征和评估——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04108-w.
6
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
7
Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of new injectable hydraulic calcium disilicate based root canal sealer: A single blinded in vitro study.新型可注射水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透及推出粘结强度的比较评价:一项单盲体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Assessing the Sealing Performance and Clinical Outcomes of Endodontic Treatment in Patients with Chronic Apical Periodontitis Using Epoxy Resin and Calcium Salicylate Seals.评估使用环氧树脂和水杨酸钙密封剂的慢性根尖周炎患者的根管治疗的密封性能和临床效果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 13;59(6):1137. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061137.
9
Effect of cleaning materials on microtensile bond strength of resin composite to primary dentin contaminated with root canal sealers.清洁材料对根管封闭剂污染的乳牙牙本质与树脂复合材料微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03090-z.
10
Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂:文献综述
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 9;45(3):e35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. eCollection 2020 Aug.