Cochrane Oral Health Group.
Br Dent J. 2010 May 22;208(10):477-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.451.
Since August 2009, members of the Primary Care Dentistry Research Forum (http://www.dentistryresearch.org) have taken part in an online vote to identify questions in day-to-day practice that they felt most needed to be answered with conclusive research. The question which received the most votes formed the subject of a critical appraisal of the relevant literature. Each month a new round of voting takes place to decide which further questions will be reviewed. Dental practitioners and dental care professionals are encouraged to take part in the voting and submit their own questions to be included in the vote by joining the website.This paper details a summary of the findings of the sixth critical appraisal. In conclusion, the critical appraisal identified a high quality systematic review carried out in 2007 relating to routine scaling. Since the Cochrane Review of 2007, we could find no new randomised controlled trials to assess the beneficial and sustained effects of routine scaling and polishing.
自 2009 年 8 月以来，初级保健牙科研究论坛（http://www.dentistryresearch.org）的成员参与了在线投票，以确定他们认为最需要用确凿的研究来回答的日常实践中的问题。获得最多票数的问题成为对相关文献进行批判性评估的主题。每月进行一轮新的投票，以决定将审查哪些进一步的问题。鼓励牙科医生和牙科保健专业人员参与投票，并通过加入该网站提交自己的问题以供投票。本文详细介绍了第六次批判性评估的结果摘要。总之，批判性评估确定了 2007 年进行的一项高质量的系统评价，该评价涉及常规洁治。自 2007 年 Cochrane 评价以来，我们没有发现新的随机对照试验来评估常规洁治和抛光的有益和持续效果。
