Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43471-6.
To date, only a few clinical studies have investigated the differences between 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and n-octyl cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives (TSAs). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the two TSAs for wound closure after ankle fracture surgeries. Fifty-six patients were randomized to receive either a 2-octyl or n-octyl cyanoacrylate TSA. At 3 and 6 months after surgery, wound cosmetic outcomes were assessed using the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES), and patient satisfaction for wound cosmesis was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and 5-item Likert scale. Functional outcomes at 6 months after surgery were assessed using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). Fifty-five patients completed the study protocol. Within the follow-up period, no differences were found between the two groups in terms of HWES, VAS, 5-item Likert scale, and OMAS. 2-octyl cyanoacrylate TSA and n-octyl cyanoacrylate TSA were comparable options for wound closure after ankle fracture surgeries in terms of wound cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and functional outcome.
迄今为止,仅有少数临床研究调查了 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和正辛基氰基丙烯酸酯局部皮肤黏合剂(TSA)之间的差异。本研究旨在比较两种 TSA 在踝关节骨折手术后伤口闭合方面的结果。56 名患者被随机分配接受 2-辛基或正辛基氰基丙烯酸酯 TSA。术后 3 个月和 6 个月,使用 Hollander 伤口评估量表(HWES)评估伤口美容效果,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 5 项 Likert 量表评估患者对伤口美容的满意度。术后 6 个月使用 Olerud-Molander 踝关节评分(OMAS)评估功能结果。55 名患者完成了研究方案。在随访期间,两组在 HWES、VAS、5 项 Likert 量表和 OMAS 方面均无差异。2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯 TSA 和正辛基氰基丙烯酸酯 TSA 在踝关节骨折手术后伤口美容、患者满意度和功能结果方面是可比较的伤口闭合选择。