Suppr超能文献

新型伤口闭合装置的评估:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Evaluation of a novel wound closure device: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, NY, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(10):1060-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01177.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

A novel wound closure device combining a mesh tape and octylcyanoacrylate (OCA) topical skin adhesive (TSA) was developed to facilitate wound closure and enhance the adhesive's strength. The objective of this study was to determine whether the incidence of wound dehiscence after laceration repair with the new device was equivalent to that after use of a high-viscosity OCA. We hypothesized that the rate of complete wound edge apposition would be equivalent for the two closure devices.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial in nine academic and community emergency departments (EDs) and urgent care centers. Patients with simple traumatic lacerations were included. Lacerations were randomly closed with a high-viscosity OCA or mesh tape-OCA combination. The rate of complete wound edge apposition at 14 days, rates of wound infection at 14 and 30 days, and the percentage of optimally appearing scars at 30 days after closure were assessed. Assuming a maximal clinically acceptable difference for equivalence of 8% in the rate of completely apposed wound edges, a sample of at least 138 patients in the tape-OCA group and at least 69 in the OCA-only group would give 80% power and a one-sided significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

During the study period the investigators enrolled 216 subjects, of whom 143 were randomized to the tape-OCA combination and 73 to the OCA-only group. Most wounds were located on the face and the upper extremities. Mean laceration length was similar in patients in both groups (tape-OCA 2.1 cm vs. OCA-only 2.0 cm; difference 0.1 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.45 to 0.58 cm). The rate of complete wound edge apposition at 14 days was higher in wounds treated with the tape-OCA combination than in wounds treated with OCA alone (86.0% vs. 78.1%). The upper bound of the one-sided CI was 1.0% for the intention-to-treat population, which was less than the predetermined acceptable difference of less than 8%. There were no between-group differences in rates of infection and optimally appearing scars.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with OCA alone, the novel tape-OCA combination is equivalent with regard to complete wound edge apposition and cosmetic appearance.

摘要

目的

开发了一种新型的伤口闭合装置,将网带和辛基氰基丙烯酸酯(OCA)局部皮肤粘合剂(TSA)结合在一起,以促进伤口闭合并增强粘合剂的强度。本研究的目的是确定使用新型装置进行裂伤修复后的伤口裂开发生率是否与使用高粘度 OCA 后的发生率相当。我们假设两种闭合装置的完全伤口边缘对合率相当。

方法

这是一项在 9 个学术和社区急诊部(ED)和紧急护理中心进行的多中心、随机临床试验。纳入单纯外伤性裂伤患者。随机使用高粘度 OCA 或网带-OCA 组合闭合伤口。在第 14 天评估完全伤口边缘对合率、第 14 天和第 30 天的伤口感染率以及第 30 天闭合后最佳外观疤痕的百分比。假设在完全对合的伤口边缘率方面,等效性的最大临床可接受差异为 8%,则在网带-OCA 组中至少有 138 例患者,在 OCA 组中至少有 69 例患者可获得 80%的效能和单侧显著性水平为 5%。

结果

在研究期间,研究者共纳入 216 名受试者,其中 143 名随机分配至网带-OCA 联合组,73 名随机分配至 OCA 组。大多数伤口位于面部和上肢。两组患者的平均裂伤长度相似(网带-OCA 组为 2.1cm,OCA 组为 2.0cm;差值为 0.1cm,95%置信区间[CI]为-0.45 至 0.58cm)。在第 14 天,使用网带-OCA 联合治疗的伤口完全对合率高于单独使用 OCA 的伤口(86.0%对 78.1%)。意向治疗人群的单侧 CI 的上限为 1.0%,小于预先设定的小于 8%的可接受差异。两组之间的感染率和外观最佳的疤痕率没有差异。

结论

与单独使用 OCA 相比,新型网带-OCA 联合在完全伤口边缘对合和美容外观方面等效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验