Suppr超能文献

生物炭处理土壤中微生物群落DNA提取方法的比较

Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for microbial communities from soil treated with biochar.

作者信息

Leite D C A, Balieiro F C, Pires C A, Madari B E, Rosado A S, Coutinho H L C, Peixoto R S

机构信息

Laboratório de Ecologia Microbiana Molecular Instituto de Microbiologia Prof. Paulo de Góes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil.

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária Solos Rio de JaneiroRJ Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Microbiol. 2014 May 19;45(1):175-83. doi: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000100023. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Many studies have evaluated the effects of biochar application on soil structure and plant growth. However, there are very few studies describing the effect of biochar on native soil microbial communities. Microbial analysis of environmental samples requires accurate and reproducible methods for the extraction of DNA from samples. Because of the variety among microbial species and the strong adsorption of the phosphate backbone of the DNA molecule to biochar, extracting and purifying high quality microbial DNA from biochar-amended soil is not a trivial process and can be considerably more difficult than the extraction of DNA from other environmental samples. The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacies of three commercial DNA extraction kits, the FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Soil (FD kit), the PowerSoil® DNA Isolation Kit (PS kit) and the ZR Soil Microbe DNA Kit Miniprep™ (ZR kit), for extracting microbial genomic DNA from sand treated with different types of biochar. The methods were evaluated by comparing the DNA yields and purity and by analysing the bacterial and fungal community profiles generated by PCR-DGGE. Our results showed that the PCR-DGGE profiles for bacterial and fungal communities were highly affected by the purity and yield of the different DNA extracts. Among the tested kits, the PS kit was the most efficient with respect to the amount and purity of recovered DNA and considering the complexity of the generated DGGE microbial fingerprint from the sand-biochar samples.

摘要

许多研究评估了生物炭施用对土壤结构和植物生长的影响。然而,很少有研究描述生物炭对天然土壤微生物群落的影响。环境样品的微生物分析需要准确且可重复的方法从样品中提取DNA。由于微生物种类的多样性以及DNA分子磷酸骨架对生物炭的强烈吸附作用,从添加生物炭的土壤中提取和纯化高质量的微生物DNA并非易事,且可能比从其他环境样品中提取DNA困难得多。本研究的目的是比较三种商业DNA提取试剂盒,即土壤快速DNA® SPIN试剂盒(FD试剂盒)、土壤强力DNA分离试剂盒(PS试剂盒)和ZR土壤微生物DNA试剂盒微量制备™(ZR试剂盒)从不同类型生物炭处理的沙子中提取微生物基因组DNA的相对效率。通过比较DNA产量和纯度以及分析PCR-DGGE产生的细菌和真菌群落图谱来评估这些方法。我们的结果表明,细菌和真菌群落的PCR-DGGE图谱受不同DNA提取物的纯度和产量影响很大。在所测试的试剂盒中,就回收DNA的量和纯度以及考虑到沙-生物炭样品产生的DGGE微生物指纹的复杂性而言,PS试剂盒是最有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9105/4059293/d519081fdae9/bjm-45-175-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验