Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham, Law & Social Sciences Building University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq018. Epub 2010 May 21.
This paper explores the nature and type of policy transfer promoted by global health partnerships to facilitate access to medication in Cameroon and the associated implementation challenges. Using concepts from policy transfer, multi-level governance and the politics of scale, the paper conceptualizes the social spaces (global-national-local linkages) through which global health policies are negotiated as transcalar networks. The framework is used to analyse policy documents, technical and media reports and journal articles focusing on two global health partnerships (GHPs)-Roll Back Malaria and the Accelerating Access Initiative-in Cameroon. Both GHPs helped to create the national Malaria and HIV/AIDS programmes in Cameroon, respectively. Global policies are negotiated through dialogue processes involving global, national and local partners who constitute the national HIV/AIDS and malaria committees. Successful policy transfer is evident from the consensual nature of decision-making. Analysis of policy implementation reveals that GHPs offer a 'technical fix' based on specific medical intervention programmes with a relatively limited focus on disease prevention. The GHP approach imposes new governance challenges due to policy resistance strategies (strategic interests of international agencies and country-specific challenges). Evidence of this is seen in the existence of several overlapping programmes and initiatives that distort accountability and governance mechanisms defined by the national committees. Finally, the implications of these challenges for achieving access to medication are discussed.
本文探讨了全球卫生伙伴关系推动的政策转移的性质和类型,以促进在喀麦隆获得药物,并探讨了相关的实施挑战。本文运用政策转移、多层次治理和尺度政治的概念,将社会空间(全球-国家-地方联系)概念化为全球卫生政策通过跨尺度网络进行协商的场所。该框架用于分析政策文件、技术和媒体报告以及以喀麦隆的两个全球卫生伙伴关系(减疟伙伴关系和加快准入倡议)为重点的期刊文章。这两个伙伴关系都为喀麦隆分别创建了国家疟疾和艾滋病毒/艾滋病方案。通过涉及全球、国家和地方伙伴的对话进程,对全球政策进行协商,他们构成了国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病和疟疾委员会。从决策的一致性可以明显看出成功的政策转移。对政策执行情况的分析表明,全球卫生伙伴关系提供了一种基于具体医疗干预方案的“技术解决办法”,相对较少关注疾病预防。由于政策抵制战略(国际机构的战略利益和特定国家的挑战),全球卫生伙伴关系方法带来了新的治理挑战。国家委员会所定义的问责制和治理机制存在多个重叠的方案和倡议,这证明了这一点。最后,讨论了这些挑战对实现药物获取的影响。