Macrina Francesco, Puddu Paolo E, Sciangula Alfonso, Totaro Marco, Trigilia Fausto, Cassese Mauro, Toscano Michele
Department of the Heart and Great Vessels Attilio Reale, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 May 25;5:42. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-42.
There are few long-term mortality prediction studies after acute aortic dissection (AAD) Type A and none were performed using new models such as neural networks (NN) or support vector machines (SVM) which may show a higher discriminatory potency than standard multivariable models.
We used 32 risk factors identified by Literature search and previously assessed in short-term outcome investigations. Models were trained (50%) and validated (50%) on 2 random samples from a consecutive 235-patient cohort. NN were run only on patients with complete data for all included variables (N = 211); SVM on the overall group. Discrimination was assessed by receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and Gini's coefficients along with classification performance.
There were 84 deaths (36%) occurring at 564 +/- 48 days (95%CI from 470 to 658 days). Patients with complete variables had a slightly lower death rate (60 of 211, 28%). NN classified 44 of 60 (73%) dead patients and 147 of 151 (97%) long-term survivors using 5 covariates: immediate post-operative chronic renal failure, circulatory arrest time, the type of surgery on ascending aorta plus hemi-arch, extracorporeal circulation time and the presence of Marfan habitus. Global accuracies of training and validation NN were excellent with AUC respectively 0.871 and 0.870 but classification errors were high among patients who died. Training SVM, using a larger number of covariates, showed no false negative or false positive cases among 118 randomly selected patients (error = 0%, AUC 1.0) whereas validation SVM, among 117 patients, provided 5 false negative and 11 false positive cases (error = 22%, AUC 0.821, p < 0.01 versus NN results). An html file was produced to adopt and manipulate the selected parameters for practical predictive purposes.
Both NN and SVM accurately selected a few operative and immediate post-operative factors and the Marfan habitus as long-term mortality predictors in AAD Type A. Although these factors were not new per se, their combination may be used in practice to index death risk post-operatively with good accuracy.
关于急性A型主动脉夹层(AAD)后的长期死亡率预测研究较少,且没有使用神经网络(NN)或支持向量机(SVM)等新模型进行的研究,这些新模型可能比标准多变量模型具有更高的辨别力。
我们使用通过文献检索确定并先前在短期结局调查中评估过的32个风险因素。模型在来自连续235例患者队列的2个随机样本上进行训练(50%)和验证(50%)。NN仅在所有纳入变量数据完整的患者(N = 211)中运行;SVM在整个组中运行。通过曲线下面积(AUC)和基尼系数以及分类性能评估辨别力。
在564±48天(95%CI为470至658天)有84例死亡(36%)。变量完整的患者死亡率略低(211例中的60例,28%)。NN使用5个协变量对60例死亡患者中的44例(73%)和151例长期存活者中的147例(97%)进行了分类:术后即刻慢性肾衰竭、循环停止时间、升主动脉加半弓手术类型、体外循环时间和马凡综合征体型。训练和验证NN的总体准确率极佳,AUC分别为0.871和0.870,但在死亡患者中的分类错误率较高。使用更多协变量训练的SVM在118例随机选择的患者中未显示假阴性或假阳性病例(错误率 = 0%,AUC为1.0),而在117例患者中进行验证的SVM有5例假阴性和11例假阳性病例(错误率 = 22%,AUC为0.821,与NN结果相比p < 0.01)。生成了一个html文件以采用和操纵所选参数用于实际预测目的。
NN和SVM都准确地选择了一些手术和术后即刻因素以及马凡综合征体型作为A型AAD长期死亡率的预测指标。尽管这些因素本身并非新因素,但它们的组合可在实践中用于准确地对术后死亡风险进行索引。