International Budget Partnership.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Jun;35(3):313-52. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2010-002.
Health system reforms that introduce insurance principles into public health systems (such as national health insurance, internal markets, and separation of purchasers and providers) have been popular in the last two decades. Little is known, however, about the political complexities of transforming existing health services into health insurance systems in developing countries. Mexico's Seguro Popular (Popular Health Insurance) program, introduced in 2003, was an attempt to do exactly this: radically alter the country's existing health service and convert it into health insurance. Popular Health Insurance (PHI) has garnered international attention and has been held up as a model for other countries to follow. Yet little has been written about the political process that led to the reform or the difficulties of implementing it. This article fills that lacuna, offering an assessment of the reform context as well as of the process of formulating, adopting, and implementing it. It argues that, while the reform has improved Mexico's public health service, it has thus far failed to transform that health service into a true insurance system. Limited institutional reform has also left PHI severely underfinanced. The Mexican case is a cautionary tale for reformers who want to transform extant health services into health insurance systems.
在过去的二十年中,将保险原则引入公共卫生系统的卫生系统改革(如国家健康保险、内部市场以及购买者和提供者的分离)非常流行。然而,对于发展中国家将现有卫生服务转变为健康保险系统的政治复杂性,人们知之甚少。墨西哥的 Popular Health Insurance(大众健康保险)计划于 2003 年推出,正是试图做到这一点:彻底改变该国现有的卫生服务并将其转变为健康保险。大众健康保险(PHI)引起了国际关注,并被视为其他国家效仿的典范。然而,对于导致改革的政治过程或实施改革的困难,几乎没有什么文字记载。本文填补了这一空白,对改革背景以及制定、通过和实施改革的过程进行了评估。它认为,尽管改革改善了墨西哥的公共卫生服务,但迄今为止,它未能将该卫生服务转变为真正的保险制度。有限的体制改革也使 PHI 严重资金不足。墨西哥的案例为那些希望将现有卫生服务转变为健康保险系统的改革者敲响了警钟。